BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//The Pari Center - ECPv6.15.18//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://paricenter.com
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for The Pari Center
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Rome
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20200329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20201025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20211010T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20211010T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20210907T144953Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250122T115442Z
UID:10000125-1633888800-1633896000@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:May the Force Be Among Us
DESCRIPTION:Watch the recording\n\n\n\n\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcEV5fcQCm0\n\n\n\n\n\nMay the Force Be Among Us: Exploring our MultiVerse with the help of Star Wars and other movies \n\n\n\nwith Jean-Francois Vezina \n\n\n\nSunday October 10\, 20219:00 PDT | 12:00 EDT | 17:00 BST  |  18:00 CEST \n\n\n\n2-hour session \n\n\n\nIf you are unable to attend the live session\, the recording will be available. \n\n\n\nJung defines the Individuation process as an expression of our own originality through collective and universal attraction points called archetypes. But can we imagine that an entire Planet or Universe has his own individuation?  If so\, how can we synchronise our personal Universe\, with the collective one? \n\n\n\nUsing the archetypal field of Star Wars Episodes 1-9\, Ready Player One\, Arrival and a surprise movie\, we will explore how to ‘travel’ through parallel universes or parallel time and extract valuable information about our Individuation in 2021. \n\n\n\nWe will use these movies to explore the concept of ‘Symphonicity\,’ a new way to see synchronicity on a collective level.  and learn how to extract Archetypal Ideas from the projection of our collective archetypical field on the screen that help inspire us in creativity in our lives. \n\n\n\nWe will then create a game to learn together the necessity of meeting the Unexpected and the necessary chances in our lives by using Arrival and a mystery movie. \n\n\n\nThis psycho-philo-poetic game is inspired by 20 years of research in my six books which I continue in the article: ‘The Space of Time: Synchronicity as an Act of Creation in Nature and Psyche’ that will be published in the next Pari Perspectives. \n\n\n\nTo see the Full Multiple Universes Program\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nJean-François Vezina is a clinical psychologist in Quebec and author of 6 books including Necessary Chances: Synchronicity in the Encounters That Transform Us by Pari Publishing. He was president of the Jungian society of Quebec for seven years and the animator and producer of the radio show Projections: Psychology and Cinema about symbols in the movies. He is also an international lecturer and a musician. www.jfvezina.net/
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/may-the-force-be-among-us/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/5-1-e1631716521680.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20211016T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20211016T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20210907T143821Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250106T085957Z
UID:10000124-1634407200-1634414400@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:Discovering Multiple Possibilities in Quantum Theory
DESCRIPTION:Watch the recording\n\n\n\n\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdDB8ueFnWU\n\n\n\n\n\nDiscovering Multiple Possibilities in Quantum Theory \n\n\n\nwith Ruth E. Kastner \n\n\n\nSaturday October 16\, 20219:00 PDT | 12:00 EDT | 17:00 BST  |  18:00 CEST \n\n\n\n2-hour session \n\n\n\nIf you are unable to attend the live session\, the recording will be available. \n\n\n\nIn her presentation Ruth will discuss the need for a paradigm change in the way we think about the world. When she says ‘we\,’ she means primarily the Western scientific tradition and its attendant metaphysical and epistemological background assumptions\, which have led to intractable problems in making sense of quantum theory. Among the assumptions leading us into this cul-de-sac are the empiricist notion that anything real must be tangible\, and the Democritan notions that (1) a container called ‘spacetime’ is the delimiter for all real objects and that (2) real entities are separable\, localizable ‘things’ that move from place to place in a local manner (as opposed to processes). A further Western background assumption is the notion that all dynamical action occurs in a unilateral fashion: e.g.\, that a physical quantity (e.g. energy) is emitted by one entity that does all the work and ends up at another spacetime point as a purely passive\, secondary effect. The latter can be understood as a ‘Yang-only’ view of interactions\, where Yang-type processes are generation\, initiation\, and creation. In contrast\, Yin-type processes include reception\, response\, and dissolution. The Western paradigm neglects this latter aspect\, and one consequence is that it has for many years overlooked an approach to field propagation that could shed new light on the physical meaning of quantum theory. \n\n\n\nRuth will also connect our current quantum conundrum to the insights of physician/psychologist Iain McGilchrist\, who has argued that Western culture has emphasized left-brain thinking (based on separation\, analysis\, and control) and neglected right-brain thinking (based on holism\, synthesis\, and intuition)\, which is equally valid and necessary. This holistic aspect includes the mode of possibility\, while the analytical\, left-brain component sees only actuality. Hans Reichenbach (expressing a minority view among philosophers of science) insightfully remarked that ‘the flow of time is a real becoming in which potentiality is transformed into actuality.’  The paradigm change required by quantum theory includes the recognition that potentiality\, or possibility (the intangible level described by quantum states and processes) is just as real as actuality (tangible spacetime phenomena). Thus\, quantum theory opens the door to an understanding that the phenomenal level of our experience rests upon a vast ocean of possibility from which creativity and the manifest level of life and experience emerges. \n\n\n\nTo see the Full Multiple Universes Program\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRuth E. Kastner earned her M.S. in Physics and Ph.D. in History and Philosophy of Science from the University of Maryland. Since that time\, she has taught widely and conducted research in Foundations of Physics\, particularly in interpretations of quantum theory. She is the author of 3 books: The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Theory: The Reality of Possibility (Cambridge University Press\, 2012; 2nd edition forthcoming in Fall 2021)\, Understanding Our Unseen Reality: Solving Quantum Riddles (Imperial College Press\, 2015); and Adventures In Quantumland: Exploring Our Unseen Reality (World Scientific\, 2019).  She has presented talks and interviews throughout the world and in video recordings on the interpretational challenges of quantum theory.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/discovering-multiple-possibilities-in-quantum-theory/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/6-1-e1631716488496.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20211017T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20211017T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20210907T142818Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250106T090354Z
UID:10000123-1634493600-1634500800@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:Science\, Philosophy\, Evidence\, Explanation and Fine-Tuning
DESCRIPTION:Watch the recording\n\n\n\n\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt6nO3MTjvA\n\n\n\n\n\nScience\, Philosophy\, Evidence\, Explanation and Fine-Tuning \n\n\n\nwith Tim Maudlin \n\n\n\nSunday October 17\, 20219:00 PDT | 12:00 EDT | 17:00 BST  |  18:00 CEST \n\n\n\n2-hour session \n\n\n\nIf you are unable to attend the live session\, the recording will be available. \n\n\n\nVarious sorts of “multiverse” scenario force us to reflect both on the aims of physics and on the sorts of considerations that can make a theory credible. This topic has been somewhat suppressed in the physics community by the prevalence of operationist and instrumentalist rhetoric (“Shut Up And Calculate”). I will survey the situation with respect to how multiverse theories could address fine-tuning problems\, and the challenges that remain in making the principles used for assessing credibility clear and explicit. \n\n\n\nTo see the Full Multiple Universes Program\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nTim Maudlin is Professor of Philosophy at NYU and Founder and Director of the John Bell Institute for the Foundations of Physics. His research interests lie primarily in the foundations of physics\, metaphysics\, and logic. His books include Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity (Blackwell)\, Truth and Paradox (Oxford)\, The Metaphysics Within Physics (Oxford)\, Philosophy of Physics: Space and Time (Princeton University Press) and New Foundations for Physical Geometry: The Theory of Linear Structures (Oxford). Philosophy of Physics: Quantum Theory comes out on March 12\, 2019. He is a member of the Academie Internationale de Philosophie des Sciences and the Foundational Questions Institute (FQXi) and has been a Guggenheim Fellow and an ACLS fellow.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/quantum-mechanics-the-actual-world-and-other-possibilities/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/14-e1634211293207.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20211020T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20211020T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20211006T110813Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240424T083303Z
UID:10000131-1634752800-1634760000@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:Imagined Problems: Real Opportunities
DESCRIPTION:Watch the recording\n\n\n\n\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qz0CxUbY3iY\n\n\n\n\n\nImagined Problems: Real Opportunities \n\n\n\nwith Susanna Wu-Pong Calvert and Gary Goldberg \n\n\n\nWednesday October 209:00am PDT  | 12:00pm EDT  | 5:00pm BST  |  6:00pm CEST \n\n\n\nThe science of perception tells us that our problems are subjective and socially constructed. So what is a “real” problem\, and what solutions become available to us?  In this engaging session\, Drs. Susanna Wu-Pong Calvert\, MAPP\, PhD and Gary Goldberg\, MD discuss the nature of perception and “reality” in our VUCA world (volatile\, uncertain\, complex\, and ambiguous). They will also discuss how to move from feelings of overwhelm and despair to inspiration and agency by accessing our deep\, inner wisdom. Joseph Campbell’s Hero’s Journey will be presented as a timeless\, increasingly relevant\, and useful frame for our individual and collective pursuit of meaning and authentic\, impactful action\, especially in light of our modern challenges. Personal stories and anecdotes will be used to illustrate how we can create our own sagas akin to Dorothy (Wizard of Oz) and Luke Skywalker (Star Wars). Participants will be invited to envision\, and then pursue their own achievable\, unique\, and deeply authentic solutions to achieve the beautiful new world that we all desire. \n\n\n\nOn Wednesday October 20\, Susanna and Gary will open our monthly Community Call followed by discussion and Q&A. \n\n\n\nTHIS EVENT IS FREE AND OPEN TO EVERYONE! \n\n\n\nJoin our Zoom meeting via the following link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86035064521 \n\n\n\nIf you would like to participate\, have any questions or need any help just contact Eleanor Peat: eleanor@paricenter.com \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDr. Susanna Wu-Pong Calvert is a 26-year veteran of higher education\, first starting at Virginia Commonwealth University where she was a faculty member in the School of Pharmacy\, Department of Pharmaceutics\, and Director of the Pharmaceutical Sciences Graduate Program for 11 years.  She joined the Office of Faculty Affairs at the University of Georgia in 2016 as the inaugural Director of Programming\, where she supported faculty success and wellbeing\, and leadership and organizational development for the 2300 faculty across the UGA campuses.  In 2018\, she founded the Foundation for Family and Community Healing\, who focuses on creating vibrant connections between individuals and their families\, communities\, and with Earth to promote wellbeing for all. \n\n\n\nSusanna has a Bachelors Degree in Pharmacy from the University of Texas\, Austin\, a Masters of Applied Positive Psychology from the University of Pennsylvania\, a PhD in pharmacy and pharmaceutical chemistry from the University of California\, San Francisco and a postdoctoral fellowship in dermatology\, also at UCSF.  During her career she has published almost 100 journal articles\, books\, and book chapters\, and has written hundreds of blogs for the Silver Lining blog (www.findingpositiveperspective.wordpress.com) and through FFCH.   She has several coaching credentials including Clifton StrengthsFinders\, Growth Edge Coaching\, Arbinger Institute\, and the Leadership Circle\, and is trained as a life coach.  Her passion is in helping individuals and organizations find and pursue their calling and the highest versions of themselves. \n\n\n\nFor more information on Susanna and her work www.HealingEdu.org and  www.SusannaCalvert.com \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDr. Gary Goldberg received an undergraduate degree in Engineering Science from the University of Toronto and then a Medical Degree from McMaster University.  He completed residency training in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation with subspecialty certification in Brain Injury Medicine.  In 2020\, he retired from clinical practice after over 35 years working in the field of brain injury rehabilitation at academic medical centers in Philadelphia\, Pittsburgh and Richmond in the USA.  He now is focused on drawing on this work experience to seek a means of conjoining faith and science into a coherent conceptual framework of holistic inquiry. \n\n\n\nGary is an energetic member of the Pari Center\, actively participating in our online events and is a member of the Pari Center Advisory Board.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/imagined-problems-real-opportunities/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/webp:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2865.jpg-e1633526572131-1.webp
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20211023T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20211023T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20210915T133526Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250106T090809Z
UID:10000129-1635012000-1635019200@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:Is the Multiverse in the Mind or is the Mind in the Multiverse?
DESCRIPTION:Watch the recording\n\n\n\n\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKtozqHKuUA\n\n\n\n\n\nIs the Multiverse in the Mind or is the Mind in the Multiverse? \n\n\n\nwith Bernard Carr \n\n\n\nSaturday October 23\, 20219:00 PDT | 12:00 EDT | 17:00 BST  |  18:00 CEST \n\n\n\n2-hour session \n\n\n\nIf you are unable to attend the live session\, the recording will be available. \n\n\n\nPhysics has been triumphant in understanding the vast array of structures in the universe and the forces which link the microscopic and macroscopic domains. This link culminates in the big bang\, where the very small (M-theory) meets the very large (the multiverse). The history of physics might also be regarded as the expansion of our consciousness to ever larger and smaller scales. However\, at each stage the micro and macro frontiers have been regarded as bordering on philosophy because of the lack of empirical data. So does the merging of the two physics/philosophy borders at the big bang indicate the end of physics or the need for a radically new paradigm. I take the latter view and argue that a feature of the next paradigm must be an expansion of physics to accommodate mind and consciousness. This proposal impinges on two problems on the borders of physics and philosophy: the relationship between physical space and perceptual space and the nature of the passage of time. It is argued that the resolution of both these problems may involve a 5-dimensional model\, with the 5th dimension being associated with mental time. This proposal may relate to recent developments in brane cosmology\, which is one version if the multiverse proposal. A description of consciousness must also entail a proper understanding of the specious present\, the minimum timescale of conscious experience\, and this may be associated with other dimensions which arise in M-theory. Higher dimensions may therefore play a vital role in linking physics\, the multiverse and mind. \n\n\n\nTo see the Full Multiple Universes Program\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nBernard Carr is Emeritus Professor of Mathematics and Astronomy at Queen Mary University of London. His professional area of research is cosmology and astrophysics and includes such topics as the early universe\, dark matter\, black holes and the anthropic principle. For his PhD he studied the first second of the Universe\, working under the supervision of Stephen Hawking at the Institute of Astronomy in Cambridge and the California Institute of Technology.He was elected to a Fellowship at Trinity College\, Cambridge\, in 1975 and moved to Queen Mary College in 1985. He has also held Visiting Professorships at Kyoto University\, Tokyo University\, the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory and the Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics. He is the author of nearly three hundred scientific papers and the books Universe or Multiverse? and Quantum Black Holes. Beyond his professional field\, he is interested in the role of consciousness in physics and in an expanded paradigm which accommodates mind. He also has a long-standing interest in the relationship between science and religion. He was President of the Society for Psychical Research in 2000-2004 and is currently President of the Scientific and Medical Network.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/is-the-multiverse-in-the-mind-or-is-the-mind-in-the-multiverse/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/9-e1634211775427.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20211024T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20211024T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20210907T184443Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250129T064309Z
UID:10000127-1635098400-1635105600@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:Closing Panel: Multiple Universes
DESCRIPTION:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9MqWMqeslk\n\n\n\n\n\nClosing Panel: Multiple Universes \n\n\n\nwith Bernard Carr\, Geraldine Patrick Encina\, Ruth Kastner\, Mindahi Crescencio Bastida Muñoz\, Paul Tappenden and Jean-Francois Vezina \n\n\n\nSunday October 24\, 20219:00 PDT | 12:00 EDT | 17:00 BST  |  18:00 CEST \n\n\n\n2-hour session \n\n\n\nIf you are unable to attend the live session\, the recording will be available. \n\n\n\nA panel discussion with some of the speakers of the Multiple Universes series will close the event\, reflecting on the various perspectives that have emerged in the presentations and comparing different world views. \n\n\n\nThe session will begin by posing the panelists a few key questions to start the discussion. It will continue as a Q&A session open to everybody. You are invited to have your questions and comments ready\, and in formulating them please be mindful of other people’s need to ask their own questions! The best questions are often the most concise ones. \n\n\n\nTo see the Full Multiple Universes Program\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nBernard Carr is Emeritus Professor of Mathematics and Astronomy at Queen Mary University of London. His professional area of research is cosmology and astrophysics and includes such topics as the early universe\, dark matter\, black holes and the anthropic principle. For his PhD he studied the first second of the Universe\, working under the supervision of Stephen Hawking at the Institute of Astronomy in Cambridge and the California Institute of Technology.He was elected to a Fellowship at Trinity College\, Cambridge\, in 1975 and moved to Queen Mary College in 1985. He has also held Visiting Professorships at Kyoto University\, Tokyo University\, the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory and the Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics. He is the author of nearly three hundred scientific papers and the books Universe or Multiverse? and Quantum Black Holes. Beyond his professional field\, he is interested in the role of consciousness in physics and in an expanded paradigm which accommodates mind. He also has a long-standing interest in the relationship between science and religion. He was President of the Society for Psychical Research in 2000-2004 and is currently President of the Scientific and Medical Network. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRuth E. Kastner earned her M.S. in Physics and Ph.D. in History and Philosophy of Science from the University of Maryland. Since that time\, she has taught widely and conducted research in Foundations of Physics\, particularly in interpretations of quantum theory. She is the author of 3 books: The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Theory: The Reality of Possibility (Cambridge University Press\, 2012; 2nd edition forthcoming in Fall 2021)\, Understanding Our Unseen Reality: Solving Quantum Riddles (Imperial College Press\, 2015); and Adventures In Quantumland: Exploring Our Unseen Reality (World Scientific\, 2019).  She has presented talks and interviews throughout the world and in video recordings on the interpretational challenges of quantum theory. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPaul Tappenden’s first degree was in philosophy and psychology but he has long taken an interest in physics and was particularly fascinated by the philosophical problems associated with quantum mechanics. His PhD from King’s College\, London\, was an attempt to relate an important current debate in philosophy of mind with ideas in the so-called Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics. Since then he has taught philosophy of science to physics students in Grenoble\, France\, and has pursued the ideas in his doctorate in a series of papers\, the most recent being in the journal Synthese\, 2019. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nJean-François Vezina is a clinical psychologist in Quebec and author of 6 books including Necessary Chances: Synchronicity in the Encounters That Transform Us by Pari Publishing. He was president of the Jungian society of Quebec for seven years and the animator and producer of the radio show Projections: Psychology and Cinema about symbols in the movies. He is also an international lecturer and a musician. www.jfvezina.net/
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/closing-panel-multiple-universes/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Multiple-Universes-6-e1634905050618.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20211106T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20211106T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20211029T081832Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240424T083210Z
UID:10000132-1636221600-1636228800@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:The Consciousness of Neuroscience
DESCRIPTION:Watch the recording\n\n\n\n\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxG7_rMpnuk\n\n\n\n\n\nThe Consciousness of Neuroscience \n\n\n\nwith Alex Gomez-Marin \n\n\n\nSaturday November 610:00am PDT  | 1:00pm EDT  | 5:00pm GMT  |  6:00pm CET \n\n\n\nFree Online Pari Dialogue \n\n\n\nThe scientific study of consciousness used to be taboo just a few decades ago\, but it is now in its heyday. Consciousness research captures the imagination of laypeople\, attracts research funding\, and sells books. Amongst neuroscientists\, the dominant position is this: whatever consciousness is\, it must somehow emerge somewhere in the brain. Where else could it be? The challenge then is to find out how subjective experience springs from neural activity. But does it? By what kind of modern alchemy is the water of the matter supposed to be transformed into the wine of experience? We are never told. Instead\, materialism excels at selling old metaphysical commitments as new scientific data. In addition\, materialism is promissory by necessity: the grand resolution is at hand but always lies ahead – the best is yet to come. Moreover\, and despite the impressive tools available\, such a conception of the physical world dates back to the nineteenth century – ironically\, physicalism is embraced by virtually everyone except physicists themselves. In sum\, the blind spot of the neuroscience of consciousness is paradoxical: a mind studies other brains and declares itself illusory\, epiphenomenal\, or emergent at best. Here\, rather than trying to answer how “matter makes mind”\, Alex Gomez-Marin questions whether it does\, and what this entails for science writ large. He argues that the science of consciousness is at a sweet crossroads: either we continue doing science as usual with ever fancier tools and bigger data or we seize the opportunity to craft a new idea of science. \n\n\n\nOn Saturday November 6\, Alex will open our monthly Community Call with a presentation and followed by discussion and Q&A. \n\n\n\nTHIS EVENT IS FREE AND OPEN TO EVERYONE! \n\n\n\nJoin our Zoom meeting via the following link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89671398135 \n\n\n\nIf you would like to participate\, have any questions or need any help just contact Eleanor Peat: eleanor@paricenter.com \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nAlex Gomez-Marin is a theoretical physicist turned cognitive neuroscientist. He was awarded his PhD in physics in 2008 by the University of Barcelona. He also holds a Masters in Biophysics from the same university. He was a postdoctoral researcher at the EMBL-CRG Centre forGenomic Regulation and at the Champalimaud Center for the Unknown\, where he studied worms\, flies and mice. Since 2016 he has been the head of the Behavior of Organisms Laboratory at the Instituto de Neurociencias (CSIC-UMH) in Alicante\, Spain. The mission of his group is to establish neuro-ethological principles across species. His latest research concentrates on machines and humans in real-world situations\, combining computational techniques with theoretical biology and continental philosophy. You can follow him at @behaviOrganisms and read his work here: https://behavior-of-organisms.org/read-us
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/the-consciousness-of-neuroscience/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/ADHUk5jg-scaled-e1635495773974.jpeg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20211120T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20211120T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20211106T150148Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240424T083158Z
UID:10000133-1637431200-1637438400@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:The Colour of Sound: Emotional Response to Music Tonality
DESCRIPTION:with Donna Colemanpianist and performance researcher \n\n\n\nSaturday November 209:00am PST  | 12:00pm EST  | 5:00pm GMT  |  6:00pm CET \n\n\n\nOn top of all this I present a fine case of coloured hearing. Perhaps “hearing” is not quite accurate\, since the colour sensation seems to be produced by the very act of my orally forming a given letter while I imagine its outline. The long a of the English alphabet . . . has for me the tint of weathered wood\, but a French a evokes polished ebony. This black group also includes a hard g (vulcanised rubber) and r (a sooty rag being ripped). Oatmeal n\, noodle-limp l\, and the ivory-backed hand mirror of o take care of the whites. . . . Passing on to the blue group\, there is steely x\, thundercloud z\, and huckleberry k. Since a subtle interaction exists between sound and shape\, I see q as browner than k\, while s is not the light blue of c\, but a curious mixture of azure and mother-of-pearl. \n\n\n\n Vladimir Nabokov\, Speak\, Memory: An Autobiography Revisited \n\n\n\nLight and sound are waves. Light waves behave differently from sound waves\, but they have wave-ness in common. Colour is a result of the refraction (bending\, movement) of light. Sound is the result of air being moved. Light and sound also have in common the fact that they are perceived by an entity. It is not inconceivable that a colour perception could evoke or be evoked by a sonic perception\, a phenomenon known as synaesthesia. \n\n\n\nThis two-hour webinar explores the emotional response to sound as potentially distinct and discrete experiences depending upon the key of the musical composition being played\, along with the possibility that the listener may hear colour. \n\n\n\nIn the years 1722 and again in 1744\, Johann Sebastian Bach wrote twenty-four preludes and fugues\, each in a different key\, for the two volumes known as Das Wohltemperierte Klavier (The Well-Tempered Keyboard). The “tempered” scale\, which had gradually evolved out of the Medieval church modes\, consists of twelve pitches\, each of which can be cast as “major” or “minor\,” for a total of twenty-four “keys.” \n\n\n\nSelected preludes from this collection of forty-eight will be performed\, and participants will be invited to make note of any and all perceptions that arise. Discussion of these responses along with general reflections upon various colour theories and the nature of perception will follow. The music of other composers who assign colour to key\, in particular\, Olivier Messiaen and Alexander Skryabin (Scriabin)\, and composers who sought to create music with “no key” (Anton Webern\, Ruth Crawford) will also be presented for listeners’ responses. \n\n\n\nOn Saturday November 20\, Donna will open our monthly Community Call with a presentation and followed by discussion and Q&A. \n\n\n\nTHIS EVENT IS FREE AND OPEN TO EVERYONE! \n\n\n\nJoin our Zoom meeting via the following link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82279864300 \n\n\n\nIf you would like to participate\, have any questions or need any help just contact Eleanor Peat: eleanor@paricenter.com \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRecommended Reading:\n\n\n\nVisualising Visions: The Significance of Messiaen’s Colours by Håkon Austbøhttps://www.musicandpractice.org/volume-2/visualizing-visions-the-significance-of-messiaens-colours/ \n\n\n\nScriabin’s Color Symbolism in Music by Ursula Rehn Wolfmanhttps://interlude.hk/scriabins-color-symbolism-music/ \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDr Donna Coleman is a multi-award-winning concert pianist\, recording artist\, author\, performance researcher and philosopher\, and master teacher whose career spans a half-century\, of which more than half has been based in Australia. She is also an accomplished weaver and photographer and an amateur but passionate astronomer and archaeologist with a keen interest in the culture of the Indigenous peoples of Australia and the United States. As Head of Keyboard and of Postgraduate Studies at the Victorian College of the Arts in Melbourne\, she convened weekly thought-provoking seminars that explored relationships between music and other disciplines. Donna is writing a book entitled Dancing with the Piano\, a collection of essays distilled from these sessions and from her many years of phenomenological engagement with her ultimate dance partner\, the piano. \n\n\n\nphoto credit: Peter Paul Geoffrion
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/emotional-response-to-music-tonality/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/image-e1636212493903.jpeg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220108T190000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220108T203000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20211211T103831Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240424T082750Z
UID:10000134-1641668400-1641673800@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:Beyond Words
DESCRIPTION:A Film Trilogy: Giving Form to the Ineffable \n\n\n\nwith director\, writer and producer Hugh PidgeonRoundtable Guests: Eelco de Geus\, Gary Goldberg\, Donna Kennedy-Glans\, Jacob Raz\, Yuriko Sato and David SchrumModerated by Lee Nichol \n\n\n\nSaturday January 8\, 2022 \n\n\n\nThree Short Films9:00am PST  | 12:00pm EST  | 5:00pm GMT  |  6:00pm CET \n\n\n\nRoundtable Conversation10:00am PST  | 1:00pm EST  | 6:00pm GMT  |  7:00pm CET \n\n\n\nFree Online Pari Dialogue\n\n\n\nI first heard of Hugh Pidgeon’s Beyond Words trilogy from Hugh himself\, when he sent me a link to view the three films. Not realizing these were short films\, I put off viewing them for some time\, assuming an hour or more for each film. When I realized they were not lengthy\, I opened them right away\, beginning with A Moment of Clarity. \n\n\n\nAt the end of Clarity\, there was a simple state of silence. Eventually I began to reflect on what I had seen\, and was taken aback to realize that not once\, in 15 minutes of film about David Bohm\, did Bohm’s image ever appear. And yet\, the very essence of Bohm was everywhere\, distilled and concentrated with great artistry and a true sense of love. \n\n\n\nAs it turns out\, all these qualities are to be found in The Wall within Our Minds and Negotiating with Gravity\, the other two films in the trilogy. But it is from within the wholeness of the three films\, seen in their original intended sequence\, that the true import of Hugh’s work emerges. The overlapping\, interlaced meanings of the trilogy evoke a sense of mystery and beauty that transcends any of the individual films. These qualities linger\, and indeed work to rearrange one’s interiority\, one’s very being. \n\n\n\nIt was with great joy to learn from Hugh – who has kept these films rather close for a number of years – that he was enthusiastic about sharing them with the larger Pari community. This prospect has now come to fruition. Please join us for this very special\, one-time-only event! \n\n\n\nLee Nichol\, Moderator \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nOn Saturday January 8\, 2022\, we are offering all our friends at the Pari Center the unique opportunity to view Hugh Pidgeon’s trilogy Beyond Words followed by a panel discussion. \n\n\n\nOur invited guests at the table will come together to discuss the ideas\, the beauty\, and the overall sense of Wholeness that is portrayed throughout. They will examine the interconnections between David Bohm\, Martin Buber\, the West-Eastern Divan Orchestra of young Palestinians and Israelis\, and the artist Andy Goldsworthy. \n\n\n\nThe films (with a combined running time of 32 minutes) can be viewed at leisure in a 60-minute window prior to the 90-minute roundtable discussion between our panelists. There will not be Q&A during this event. \n\n\n\nIt is essential that you get your ticket above in order to receive the necessary links. \n\n\n\nTHIS EVENT IS FREE AND OPEN TO EVERYONE! \n\n\n\nPlease get your ticket for this event at the top of the page and you will be sent the links to the films and to the roundtable conversation.  \n\n\n\nIf you have any questions or need any help just contact Eleanor Peat: eleanor@paricenter.com \n\n\n\nJoin us at the Pari Center on Saturday January 8\, 2022 for a screening of Hugh Pidgeon’s trilogy Beyond Words followed by a panel conversation. This is a unique opportunity to not only view Hugh’s films but to hear a ninety-minute roundtable conversation on the ideas presented in the films. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThanks to creator and director Hugh Pidgeon\, it is our privilege to screen the Beyond Words trilogy\, Hugh’s stunning short films\, free of charge\, for the Pari Center community. \n\n\n\nThe Beyond Words trilogy opens with The Wall in Our Minds which introduces Arab and Jewish young musicians from the West-Eastern Divan Orchestra\, with founder and conductor Daniel Barenboim who believes the orchestra is a metaphor for what could be achieved in the Middle East. \n\n\n\nThese young people were brought together as a one-off scratch orchestra in 1999 (yet is still giving performances) by Barenboim and the philosopher and writer\, the late Edward Said. The name chosen for the orchestra The West-Eastern Divan was the title of a collection of lyrical poems by Goethe. One hundred years earlier\, Martin Buber prefaced two lines from the very same collection in his book I and Thou. \n\n\n\nNegotiating With Gravity\, the second film in the trilogy\, was the outcome of an invitation to the director to lead a plenary at an international conference of Gestalt therapists on Martin Buber’s contribution to the core notions of dialogue that inform Gestalt psychotherapy. \n\n\n\nFor Buber the first of what he called the ‘spheres of relation’ was our life with Nature. Going beyond words\, the photographic essay that became the film followed conversations with a botanist from Kew Gardens\, a professor of physics at Oxford\, a professor of mathematics at Warwick University\, a resident ecologist at Schumacher College\, and an artist whose paintings feature in the film\, the better to understand the five perspectives that featured in the passage from Buber’s book and begins ‘I consider a tree.’ \n\n\n\nThe third in the series A Moment of Clarity was conceived as a sister film to bring David Bohm and Martin Buber together for the first time in the same space. In Bohm’s Wholeness and the Implicate Order the physicist includes extensive reference to the Ancient Greek notions of measure in music and the visual arts. \n\n\n\nHugh drew his inspiration from Andy Goldsworthy\, a site-specific sculptor whose work he has long admired and is featured on the cover of the Routledge edition of Bohm’s On Dialogue edited by Lee Nichol. It is Andy Goldsworthy who speaks of a moment of clarity at the close of the film. \n\n\n\nHugh presents an entirely new configuration of Goldsworthy’s film Rivers and Tides brought into conjunction with David Bohm’s writing on process from Wholeness and the Implicate Order\, and the extraordinary Ice Music of Norwegian musician Terje Isungset. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nHugh Pidgeon is an organisational consultant\, an academic and a practicing Gestalt psychotherapist. He has been as much influenced in his work by the teaching of Martin Buber on dialogue as he has been by that of David Bohm .  Drawn by the commonality of insight they shared with each other\, Hugh created the trilogy Beyond Words\, several years in the making\, that features the two of them for the first time in the same space. \n\n\n\nA number of years living and working in Thailand and China and often visiting Japan have also proved a significant influence on Hugh personally.  He was first introduced to David Bohm’s work by fellow US consultants Roger Harrison and Peter Block while he was representing a Kansas City-based consultancy in Europe and was intrigued from the beginning by the interest David Bohm developed in the parallels in Buddhist teaching to his own work as a physicist. \n\n\n\nHugh’s primary interest is the contribution a dialogic orientation yet might make to the fractious collisions of opinion on how best to address our seemingly insatiable determination as the human race to sacrifice the ecological balance of the planet in pursuit of our own economic development – the outcome of the fragmentation in the way we think that David Bohm anticipated over 40 years ago. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nEelco de Geus met the work of David Bohm in his Dialogue Training in Germany with Freeman Dhoritiy. He is inspired by the integration of Bohm’s Thinking\, the relational approaches in the works of Martin Buber\, the process work of Arnold Mindell and different community building practices. Eelco applies this integration in a proces- oriented approach on dialogue\,  that inquires beyond words into the essence of human connection. He is co- founder of the Dialogue Academy Vienna\, which provides learning spaces for dialogue process work and systemic constellations. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nGary Goldberg received an undergraduate degree in Engineering Science from the University of Toronto and then a Medical Degree from McMaster University.  He completed residency training in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation with subspecialty certification in Brain Injury Medicine.  In 2020\, he retired from clinical practice after over 35 years working in the field of brain injury rehabilitation at academic medical centers in Philadelphia\, Pittsburgh and Richmond in the USA.  He now is focused on drawing on this work experience to seek a means of conjoining faith and science into a coherent conceptual framework of holistic inquiry. \n\n\n\nGary is an energetic member of the Pari Center\, actively participating in our online events and is a member of the Pari Center Advisory Board. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDonna Kennedy-Glans is a boundary-crosser. As a Canadian\, she has worked on the ground to add value to enterprising projects in over thirty-five countries\, in the public\, private and non-profit sectors. Donna began her career as a lawyer in the energy sector\, where she held several unique and pioneering roles involving corporate integrity\, transparency and sustainability. She founded a non-profit to build the capacity of women in Yemen\, served as an elected politician and cabinet minister in the province of Alberta\, has held leading roles on boards of directors\, and participates with her siblings in the stewardship of a family farm enterprise. \n\n\n\nDonna’s book about her work with women in Yemen—Unveiling the Breath: One Woman’s Journey into Understanding Islam and Gender Equality–was published by Pari Publishing in 2009. Donna’s latest book—Teaching the Dinosaur to Dance: Moving Beyond Business as Usual—will be released in March 2022; see teachingthedinosaur.com for details. Donna blogs at https://beyondpolarity.blog and is active on several social media platforms. She is an amateur photographer and delighted grandmother to two-year-old Kennedy. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nLee Nichol is the editor of David Bohm’s On Dialogue; On Creativity; and The Essential David Bohm. From 1980-1992 he collaborated with Bohm on various aspects of dialogue\, consciousness\, and education. \n\n\n\nHe has been on the faculty of the Arthur Morgan School in Celo\, NC; of the Oak Grove School in Ojai\, CA; of the Nyingma Institute in Berkeley\, CA; and of Denver University in Denver\, CO. \n\n\n\nLee has recently released – Entering Bohm’s Holoflux – which can be downloaded for free at: https://paricenter.com/product/entering-bohms-holoflux-by-lee-nichol/ \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nJacob Raz is Professor Emeritus\, East Asian Studies\, Tel Aviv University. He translates and writes on Buddhism\, Zen Buddhism\, and Japanese Culture and poetry\, as well as his own haiku. Raz lived many years in Japan and travelled extensively in Asia. He has long been a practitioner and teacher of Zen. \n\n\n\nRaz has taught seminars and workshops on Martin Buber and Buddhism\, and wrote the Afterword in the new translation of Martin Buber’s book I and Thou into Hebrew [2014]. He has been active in the Consciousness Laboratory\, Tel Aviv University\, and wrote extensively on the subject. \n\n\n\nHe is also the father of Yoni\, a loving person with DS.  They speak ‘Yonish’\,  a language they have been creating over a lifetime through constant\, embodied dialogue. Consequently\, Raz became a social activist\, and has led a national movement toward a paradigmatic change in the life and dialogue with people with disabilities. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nYuriko Sato is a Japanese Jungian analyst and psychotherapist\, and a graduate of the C.G. Jung Institute Zürich. She studied medicine and worked as a psychiatrist in Osaka and Kyoto. She has private psychotherapy practices in Zürich and Bern\, and is a training/supervising analyst at ISAPZURICH (International School of Analytical Psychology Zürich)\, where she teaches on topics such as the Eastern (Japanese) psyche\, narcissism\, and psychiatry. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDavid Schrum received his PhD in quantum theory at Queen’s University\, following which he spent two post-doctoral years with David Bohm at Birkbeck College. Here\, he entered Bohm’s world of creative and subtle philosophical approaches to physics and his enquiry into consciousness and what may lie beyond. \n\n\n\nDavid Schrum continues in these explorations\, in physics developing a new approach to relativistic quantum theory and\, through the dialogue process\, going into what it is to bring to light that which lies enfolded within our individual and collective consciousness.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/beyond-words/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/beyond-words-e1639493639132.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220119T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220119T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20220105T144533Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240424T082600Z
UID:10000135-1642615200-1642622400@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:The Future Scientist - A Conversation with Dr. Iain McGilchrist
DESCRIPTION:A Conversation between Dr. Iain McGilchrist and Dr. Àlex Gómez-Marín \n\n\n\nWednesday January 199:00am PST  | 12:00pm EST  | 5:00pm GMT  |  6:00pm CET \n\n\n\nThe session is live and all registered participants will receive the RECORDING. \n\n\n\nA monthly virtual encounter to understand where science is going and to reimage where we hope it might go. \n\n\n\nScience as we know it is a relatively recent human invention. \n\n\n\nAfter the ‘scientific revolution’ of the seventeenth century\, science and philosophy remained entangled as ‘natural philosophy’ until they started to separate in the nineteenth century (the very word ‘scientist’ was coined in 1834). Subsequently\, science morphed from an activity carried out by wealthy people as a hobby (the ‘amateur\,’ in the etymological sense of the word) into a paid job within an institutionalized system (the ‘professional’). Paradoxically or not\, great ideas come more easily from people who are not paid to have them—it’s like forcing someone to be free\, or compelling creativity by an act of will. \n\n\n\nIn the last decades\, a series of technological and societal changes have further accelerated mutations of what it means to be a scientist; from the selection forces cast by neoliberalism on ‘scientific careers\,’ to the kind of ‘science in the age of selfies’ that social media promotes. Scientists too are prey to the perverse dynamics of nowadays ‘attention economy.’ To understand what scientists do and why they do it\, one must also understand the political and social contexts in which they live. \n\n\n\nIn addition\, the rise of ‘big science’—initially in physics (particle physics and astronomy)\, and subsequently in life and mind sciences (genomics\, and connectomics)—is reconfiguring the landscape typically inhabited by the romantic figure of the lone scientist receiving visions in dream-like states of consciousness and\, eventually\, advancing science in a stroke of genius. In turn\, the idea of the scientist bred in the current academe is that of a diligent caffeinated deluxe technician as a part within the larger mechanism of research group army; a person trained exquisitely (and almost exclusively) on a research aspect\, a specialist unable to keep track of what goes on beyond the narrow confines of his/her discipline. Young scientists are indeed trained to be good at following rules and procedures (explicit laboratory protocols\, but also implicit codes of conduct and metaphysical commitments) but discouraged to learn to see when and how to transcend them. \n\n\n\nIn turn\, the more recent promises of ‘big data’ and ‘artificial intelligence’ posit a near-future landscape where some of the core skills and tasks traditionally attributed to humans may be soon carried out by machines (or so the ‘scientific soteriologists’ claim). Algorithms are not just ingenious means to an end that require human intervention to imbue them with meaning\, but are swiftly becoming ends in themselves\, pretending they offer an automated unbiased interpretation of the data. \n\n\n\nA re-appraisal of the habits of the modern scientist entails an ethical dimension as well: why do we treat animals as objects (as means\, rather than ends in themselves)\, why do we study life in laboratories primarily by killing it\, and why do we study life in laboratories in the first place? These questions also reflect on ecological considerations regarding our place in nature (humans in relationship with other animals\, and other kingdoms of life) and our destruction of the planet. Francis Bacon’s prophetic vision of the Promethean scientist\, so vividly captured in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein\, has become both a cautionary tale and an inspiration. \n\n\n\nIn addition\, and despite the real ‘paradigm changes’ in physics at the beginning of the twentieth century\, other branches of science such as biology and neuroscience remain under the spell of philosophical promissory materialism. Research facts are sold in tandem with covert metaphysical commitments. The objective-subjective divide still puzzles both scientists and the layperson. The mind-body problem remains to be solved (or dissolved). \n\n\n\nIn sum\, the whole enterprise seems to be committed to suppressing broad thinkers\, promoting academics that look more like corporate managers\, PR mavericks and professional fund-raisers and less like scholars\, who are asked to inhibit their interest in philosophy\, and to cast suspicion on their fertile imagination. Dogma and habit are inhibiting free inquiry. \n\n\n\nIt is as if science as a whole is becoming less scientific. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nIn the face of this milieu of factors\, in this series of online events we seek to reflect on what ‘the future scientist’ may look like. This is an ambitious exercise indeed\, which goes beyond mere theoretical speculation. It is not unlikely that sooner than we think current science will be unrecognizable to most of us. The consequences for humanity writ large\, not just for scientists themselves\, are pressing. \n\n\n\nThe question at stake is whether by ‘future scientist’ we mean what scientists in the future are all likely to look like\, or what a future better scientist might look like. In our conversations we will engage more in prescribing than in predicting\, that is\, we might begin by describing where science is going (prediction) to then describe where we hope science might go (prescription). Attempting the art of ‘dia-logos\,’ we hope to express a creative voice that will enlighten the way of a new science in the twenty-first century. \n\n\n\nThe series will be direct conversations\, that is\, no formal presentation of the invited speaker but a kind of ‘thinking aloud’ in the mode of a dialogue between each guest and Àlex Gómez-Marín as the conversation host. The idea is to engage critically with various aspects of ‘the future scientist’ in a lively and spontaneous format for approximately 45 minutes to an hour\, followed by comments and questions from the audience. Each conversation will take place virtually\, on a Wednesday each month. \n\n\n\nThe invited speakers to The Future Scientist series are chosen not just as great interlocutors to discuss these issues\, but also as exemplars and hints of what ‘the future scientist’ may actually look like here and now. \n\n\n\nJoin Iain McGilchrist and Àlex Gómez-Marín on Wednesday January 19 for the first event in this series. \n\n\n\nThe dialogue will be in a lively and spontaneous format of approximately 45 minutes up to an hour and we will then open up for questions from the audience. \n\n\n\nThe session is live and all registered participants will receive the RECORDING. \n\n\n\nSome likely topics that may emerge in this first conversation involve (i) the need of synthesis in the face of piles of analytic studies\, (ii) the pursuit of convergence from different lines of inquiry (such as neurology\, philosophy\, and physics)\, and (iii) the constraints\, both challenges and opportunities\, of doing research with and without current academia. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDr Iain McGilchrist is a Quondam Fellow of All Souls College\, Oxford\, an Associate Fellow of Green Templeton College\, Oxford\, a Fellow of the Royal College of Psychiatrists\, a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts\, and former Consultant Psychiatrist and Clinical Director at the Bethlem Royal & Maudsley Hospital\, London.  He has been a Research Fellow in neuroimaging at Johns Hopkins Hospital\, Baltimore and a Fellow of the Institute of Advanced Studies in Stellenbosch.  He has published original articles and research papers in a wide range of publications on topics in literature\, philosophy\, medicine and psychiatry.  He is the author of a number of books\, but is best-known for The Master and his Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World (Yale 2009).  A book on neuroscience\, epistemology and ontology called The Matter with Things: Our Brains\, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World\, was published in November 2021. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDr Alex Gomez-Marin is a theoretical physicist turned cognitive neuroscientist. He earned his PhD in Physics in 2008 from the University of Barcelona\, where we studied the microscopic origins of the arrow of time. He also holds a Masters in Biophysics from the same university. He was a Juan de la Cierva Fellow at the EMBL-CRG Centre for Genomic Regulation where he investigated the neurobiology of action and perception in fruit flies\, and a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Champalimaud Center for the Unknown in Lisbon\, Portugal\, where he deployed a computational ethology approach to establish neuro-ethological principles in worms\, flies and mice. Since 2016 he is the head of the Behavior of Organisms Laboratory at the Instituto de Neurociencias in Alicante\, Spain\, where he has been a Ramón y Cajal Fellow\, and where he currently is an Associate Professor of the Spanish Research Council. His latest research concentrates on consciousness and cognition in humans in real-world situations\, combining high-resolution experiments with theoretical biology and continental philosophy. He is the author of a number of research articles\, and he is shortly to publish his first book in Spanish on the ‘tales not told’ in current neuroscience. Born in Barcelona\, he now lives in the Mediterranean coast of Alicante and has two daughters and a cat. You can follow him on social media at @behaviOrganisms and read his work here: https://behavior-of-organisms.org/read-us
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/the-future-scientist-a-conversation-with-dr-iain-mcgilchrist/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/25C401ED-7002-4827-850A-C0B33FDAA2B0.jpeg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220126T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220126T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20220111T083709Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240424T082517Z
UID:10000136-1643220000-1643227200@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:Musical Borrowing: Theft or Tribute?
DESCRIPTION:Watch the recording\n\n\n\n\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ssv-oIe8D4\n\n\n\n\n\na webinar produced\, presented\, and performed by \n\n\n\nDr Donna Coleman \n\n\n\nStreaming from Studio OutBach® Santa Fe\, situated in the heart of the deep Indigenous history of Native New Mexico\, from ancient Paleoindians to Keres- and Tanoan-speaking peoples who were raided by the Comanches. \n\n\n\nWednesday January 269:00am PST  | 12:00pm EST  | 5:00pm GMT  |  6:00pm CET  |  4:00am AEST \n\n\n\nFrom the series: \n\n\n\nThe Quintessence of Music with Dr Donna Coleman\n\n\n\nA monthly musical and philosophical journey into the Mind\, Heart\, and Soul of Sound Organized in Time\n\n\n\n“What has been will be again\, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun. Is there anything of which one can say\, ‘Look! This is something new’? It was here already\, long ago; it was here before our time.” \n\n\n\nEcclesiastes 1: 10–11 \n\n\n\nThe practice of appropriating a musical phrase\, a motivic idea\, a concept\, or even an entire melodic line as material for a “new” musical composition is as old as music itself. Composers from Johann Sebastian Bach (and before) to the present day have mined hymns\, folk music\, the clickety-claque of train trucks on the rails\, and the work of other composers (who may have borrowed from others themselves!) in the process of creating their own sonatas\, cantatas\, symphonies\, and suites. \n\n\n\nThis two-hour\, interactive webinar asks participants to consider the notion of originality vs plagiarism. If a composer “borrows” material from a pre-existing musical source\, at what point can that composer claim that her material is “hers”? \n\n\n\nDonna will discuss and perform examples of musical compositions by Johann Sebastian Bach\, Ferruccio Busoni\, and Charles Ives that make extensive and obvious use of borrowed material. Participants will have the opportunity to present their response to the question: theft or tribute? \n\n\n\nOn Wednesday January 26\, Donna will open our monthly Community Call with a presentation and followed by discussion and Q&A. \n\n\n\nTHIS EVENT IS FREE AND OPEN TO EVERYONE! \n\n\n\nJoin our Zoom meeting via the following link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81479605511 \n\n\n\nIf you would like to participate\, have any questions or need any help just contact Eleanor Peat: eleanor@paricenter.com \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRecommended Reading:\n\n\n\nSketch of a New Esthetic of Music by Ferruccio Busoni (1907)https://www.gutenberg.org/files/31799/31799-h/31799-h.htmTranslated by Theodore Baker; published 1911 by Schirmer \n\n\n\nEssays Before a Sonata by Charles Edward Ives (1918)https://www.gutenberg.org/files/3673/3673-h/3673-h.htmPublished by The Knickerbocker Press\, 1920 at Ives’s expense \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDonna Coleman is a multi-award-winning concert pianist\, recording artist\, author\, performance researcher and philosopher\, and master teacher whose career spans a half-century\, of which more than half has been based in Australia. She is also an accomplished weaver and photographer and an amateur but passionate astronomer and archaeologist with a keen interest in the culture of the Indigenous peoples of Australia and the United States. As Head of Keyboard and of Postgraduate Studies at the Victorian College of the Arts in Melbourne\, she convened weekly thought-provoking seminars that explored relationships between music and other disciplines. Donna is writing a book entitled Dancing with the Piano\, a collection of essays distilled from these sessions and from her many years of phenomenological engagement with her ultimate dance partner\, the piano. \n\n\n\nPhoto credit: Peter Paul Geoffrion
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/musical-borrowing-theft-or-tribute/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/isaac-ibbott-Hlo8ucqYL14-unsplash-scaled-e1641906011559.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220205T175900
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220306T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20240314T164703Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240424T081255Z
UID:10000066-1644083940-1646596800@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:Dualities
DESCRIPTION:Dualities: The Marriage of Opposites\n\n\n\nwith Jena Axelrod\, Mauro Bergonzi\, Anjali D’souza\, Andrew Fellows\, Gary Goldberg\, Basil Hiley\, Ruth Kastner\, Shantena Sabbadini\, Mark Saban and David Schrum \n\n\n\nand 4 Sunday sessions with Mark Vernon onDualities on Spiritual Paths: Oppositions and Contraries in Plato\, Dante\, William Blake and Iain McGilchrist \n\n\n\nFebruary 5 – 6\, 12 – 13\, 19 – 20\, 26 – 27\, March 5 – 6 20229:00 PST | 12:00 EST | 17:00 GMT  |  18:00 CET \n\n\n\n10 Two-hour sessions\, Saturdays and Sundays \n\n\n\nAll sessions are live and you will be sent the RECORDING. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nProgram of Event\n\n\n\nSaturday February 5A Conversation about Duality and Non-duality in East and Westwith Anjali D’souza\, Andrew Fellows and Shantena Sabbadini \n\n\n\nSunday February 6The Way of Love: Plato and Participation in the Good\, Beautiful and Truewith Mark Vernon \n\n\n\nSaturday February 12Duo Duels on Non-duality\, the Quantum Potential\, and the Nature of Consciousnesswith Jena Axelrod and Basil Hiley \n\n\n\nSunday February 13The Way Up and the Way Down: Dante and the One Path from Hell to Paradisewith Mark Vernon \n\n\n\nSaturday February 19Connecting the Actuality of Things in Space-Time to the Reality of Possibility in QuantumLand: Convergences in Quantum Physics\, Brain Science\, Philosophy and Mystical Thoughtwith Gary Goldberg and Ruth E. Kastner \n\n\n\nSunday February 20Contraries and Human Existence: William Blake and Cleansing the Doors of Perceptionswith Mark Vernon \n\n\n\nSaturday February 26Beyond Dualistic Mind: Journeying Together on David Bohm’s ‘No Road’with David Schrum \n\n\n\nSunday February 27The Master and the Emissary: Dualities in the Philosophy of Iain McGilchristwith Mark Vernon \n\n\n\nSaturday March 5Jung’s Two Personalities: Psychological Implicationswith Mark Saban \n\n\n\nSunday March 6Dualities and Non-Dualitywith Mauro Bergonzi and Shantena Sabbadini \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nJoin us online at the Pari Center to explore the fascinating and seemingly endless topic of dualities where together with experts and scholars we will examine the meaning of dualities in physics\, philosophy\, spirituality\, literature\, psychology and reality. \n\n\n\nThe opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth.Niels BohrAs quoted by his son Hans Bohr in ‘My Father\,’ published in Niels Bohr: His Life and Work. \n\n\n\nBeauty is the harmony of opposing things.Sculptor Constantin Brancusi (1876-1957) \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nLife is full of dualities. Things coexist\, oppose\, contrast and parallel every day. Duality teaches us that every aspect of life is created from a balanced interaction of opposite and competing forces. Yet these forces are not just opposites; they are complementary. \n\n\n\nAccording to the Cambridge Dictionary the word dual means ‘with two parts’ and duality ‘the state of combining two things.’ In philosophy ‘mind-body dualism’ was first formulated by the 17th-century French philosopher René Descartes who stated that there exists a clear distinction between physical and mental phenomena.. \n\n\n\nIn many of the theologies and religions of the world we also find the pervasive idea that the forces of good and evil are equally balanced in the universe. Another common idea is that of the dual nature of human beings\, existing in both body and spirit. Christian dualism refers to the belief that God and creation are distinct and also a belief in the dual personality of Christ (human and divine). Traditional Chinese philosophy similarly believes that there is both an active male and passive female principle in the universe\, which is embodied in the symmetric yin-yang. \n\n\n\nIn 1933\, C.G. Jung wrote that duality is a fact of human nature and that we cannot achieve wholeness without integrating the dark or shadow side of the self. According to Jung it is the lack of awareness of our duality and inner contrasts that may lead to uncontrolled outbursts of the shadow\, as in the time of the Nazis. \n\n\n\nSeveral political theories also show evidence of a kind of dualistic thinking. In Marxism\, for example\, we find a dialectical view of the relationship between the theory and empirical practice (praxis) of society and political systems\, the thesis and anti-thesis\, a continual tension between capitalism and socialism\, as well as between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie.  \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nA key notion of quantum mechanics is the complementarity of incompatible observables\, which are both needed to fully describe a quantum system\, but cannot be measured simultaneously. An example is the complementarity of position and momentum of a particle and more generally of ‘particle’ and ‘wave’ behaviour of quantum systems. \n\n\n\nDuality is explored in such fictional writings as Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde\, Romeo and Juliet\, The Picture of Dorian Grayand even in the contrasting characters of Harry Potter and Voldemort. Films such as Black Swan and Fight Club explore the dualism of human nature. Batman and Joker are the polar opposites of order and chaos\, light and darkness. And it is the two-sided nature of the Force that propels the storyline in Star Wars. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nIn the visual arts\, The Kiss\, by Constantin Brancusi (1876-1957) depicts a nearly indistinguishable man and woman as two figures become one as they emerge from a single block of material. Dutch artist M.C. Escher was fascinated by duality and symmetry. \n\n\n\nIn Lao Tzu’s Tao Te Ching we read: \n\n\n\nWhen in the world all appreciate beauty as beauty\,then ugliness is already there;when all appreciate good as good\,then bad is already there. \n\n\n\n Therefore being and non-being generate each other\,difficult and easy complete each other\,long and short define each other\,high and low lean towards each other\,voice and music harmonise with each other\,before and after follow each other.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/dualities-2/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Dualities-2022-e1643797297554.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220205T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220205T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20211221T173840Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240324T154626Z
UID:10000077-1644084000-1644091200@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:A Conversation about Duality and Non-duality in East and West
DESCRIPTION:A Conversation about Duality and Non-duality in East and West \n\n\n\nwith Anjali D’souza\, Andrew Fellows and Shantena Sabbadini \n\n\n\nSaturday February 5\, 20229:00 PST | 12:00 EST | 17:00 GMT  |  18:00 CET \n\n\n\n2-hour session \n\n\n\nThe session is live and you will be sent the RECORDING. \n\n\n\nOur primary subjective experience is one of duality\, of experiencing the separateness of self and the rest of the world around us. This informs how we live and perceive the world\, the knowledge and institutional systems we have created throughout history and as we continue to do so in the present. \n\n\n\nOn the other hand\, some Eastern systems and mystics of all religions have insisted on the fundamental non-duality of the world. In India for instance\, the belief in the discrete disconnected egoic self is seen as epitomizing ignorance and the root cause of suffering. The experience of nonduality liberates and transforms one’s existence. The Tao in Chinese philosophy is the symbol and experience of integration and wholeness\, nonduality beyond duality\, undergirding the universe. In our contemporary times the insights and explorations into nonduality have been coming through Quantum physics; consequently\, initiating much needed dialogues between science and spirituality. \n\n\n\nNonduality as a construct and experience is not merely a wondrous spiritual belief\, or an exploration into fascinating but abstract ideas. It has tangible consequences individually\, collectively and politically for the integrity of ourselves and our world/planet as a whole. It impacts how we choose to live\, relate and behave as we begin to understand that we are all one indivisible whole. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nTo see the Full Dualities Program\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nAnjali D’Souza has a Master’s degree in Sociology and has just completed her training in Jungian Analysis at ISAP-Zurich. She has 20 years of experience  working in India as a psychotherapist and consultant with individuals\, groups\, communities and organisations. She also trained as an Indian classical dancer and subsequently studied dance expression and Authentic Movement. Her multi systemic approach is shaped by her own experiences\, C.G. Jung\, the expressive arts\, Indian philosophy\, and gender and post-colonial studies. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nAndrew Fellows\, is a Jungian Analyst (AGAP/IAAP) with private practices in Bern and Zürich\, a deep ecologist\, and a writer. He holds a Doctorate in Applied Physics (Dunelm)\, and enjoyed two decades of international professional engagement with renewable energy\, sustainable development and environmental policy before moving from the U.K. to Switzerland in 2001 to study Analytical Psychology. His special interests include the anima mundi\, the mid-life transition\, the new sciences\, and the use of depth psychology to understand and address global collective and environmental problems\, especially climate change and other aspects of the Anthropocene. His personal passions include nature\, mountains and music\, and he lives over three thousand feet above sea level in rural Switzerland without a car. \n\n\n\nHis lecture draws on many years of independent research and writing\, from which he has presented his evolving ideas since 2007 at international conferences in England\, Estonia\, Japan\, Switzerland and the U.S. in addition to teaching at ISAP Zurich. His first book\, published by Routledge in March 2019\, is Gaia\, Psyche and Deep Ecology: Navigating Climate Change in the Anthropocene.  \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nShantena Augusto Sabbadini graduated from the University of Milan in 1968 and was awarded his PhD in physics from the University of California in 1976. In Milan he researched the foundations of quantum physics\, laying the base for what is currently known as the decoherence interpretation of quantum physics. At the University of California\, he contributed to the theoretical work behind the first identification of a black hole\, the X-ray source Cygnus X-1. In the 1990s he was scientific consultant for the Eranos Foundation\, an East-West research center founded under the auspices of C.G. Jung in the 1930s. In that context he produced various translations and commentaries of Chinese classics in Italian and English\, including the Yijing and the trilogy of Daoist classics\, the Laozi\, the Zhuangzi and the Liezi. From 2002 onwards he collaborated with F. David Peat running the Pari Center for New Learning and in 2017 he succeeded his friend and colleague as director of the center. \n\n\n\nShantena leads workshops and courses on the philosophical implications of quantum physics\, on Daoism\, and on using the Yijing as a tool for introspection. His most recent book in English\, Pilgrimages to Emptiness: Rethinking Reality through Quantum Physics\, was published by Pari Publishing in 2017.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/a-conversation-about-duality-and-non-duality-in-east-and-west/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/1-e1640780593677.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220206T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220206T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20211221T180158Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240324T224905Z
UID:10000079-1644170400-1644177600@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:The Way of Love: Plato and Participation in the Good\, Beautiful and True
DESCRIPTION:The Way of Love: Plato and Participation in the Good\, Beautiful and True \n\n\n\nwith Mark Vernon \n\n\n\nSunday February 6\, 20229:00 PST | 12:00 EST | 17:00 GMT  |  18:00 CET \n\n\n\n2-hour session \n\n\n\nThe session is live and you will be sent the RECORDING. \n\n\n\nThough Plato is often accused of dualism\, the word itself didn’t exist in his time\, which points to a subtler and crucial reassessment of what the Ancient Greek philosopher was driving at. He recognised that the body and death are sites of experience within which we can know of their seeming opposites\, namely life itself. This realisation is gained by fostering the capacity to love. We will also consider how early Platonic thought developed with Neoplatonic and theistic perceptions. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nTo see the Full Dualities Program\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nMark Vernon is a writer and psychotherapist. He contributes to and presents programmes on the radio\, as well as writing for the national and religious press\, and online publications. He also podcasts\, in particular The Sheldrake-Vernon Dialogues with Rupert Sheldrake\, gives talks and leads workshops. He has a PhD in ancient Greek philosophy\, and other degrees in physics and in theology\, having studied at Durham\, Oxford and Warwick universities. He is the author of several books\, including A Secret History of Christianity: Jesus\, the Last Inkling and the Evolution of Consciousness which in part explores the work of Owen Barfield. He used to be an Anglican priest and lives in London\, UK. He is working on the notion of spiritual intelligence with the research group\, Perspectiva. Mark’s latest book is Dante’s Divine Comedy: A Guide for the Spiritual Journey\, Angelico Press\, 2021. For more information see www.markvernon.com.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/the-way-of-love-plato-and-participation-in-the-good-beautiful-and-true/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/3-e1640780677957.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220212T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220212T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20220111T145303Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240324T163423Z
UID:10000137-1644688800-1644696000@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:Duo Duels on Non-duality\, the Quantum Potential\, and the Nature of Consciousness
DESCRIPTION:Duo Duels on Non-duality\, the Quantum Potential\, and the Nature of Consciousness \n\n\n\nwith Basil Hiley and Jena Axelrod \n\n\n\nSaturday February 12\, 20229:00 PST | 12:00 EST | 17:00 GMT  |  18:00 CET \n\n\n\n2-hour session \n\n\n\nThe session is live and you will be sent the RECORDING. \n\n\n\nJoin quantum physicist Basil Hiley and Pari Center’s Jena Axelrod in a dynamic discussion on the structure of our universe\, the quantum potential\, the nature of consciousness\, and the paradigm shift they both see as being necessary in the West. \n\n\n\nNondual philosophy teaches that\, ‘the multiplicity of the universe is reducible to one essential reality.’ The conclusion is that reality is a dynamic process accessible and known to people through music\, art\, transpersonal psychology\, Buddhism\, physics\, and many more\, if not all\, fields. The Western worldview favours the mechanistic\, static\, ridgid\, and as such has lost the sense of dynamism\, and interconnectedness prevalent in most indigenous cultures\, Eastern philosophies\, and in the science of the quantum potential. \n\n\n\nBoth Basil and Jena perceive nonduality as a core truth of our reality. Basil approaches the nature of reality\, and the quantum potential\, from the perspective of math and physics; Jena approaches the nature of reality\, and of our unified consciousness from within\, via the experiential internal explorations of a psychonaut. \n\n\n\nHow then might these two seem to converge in their shared worldview—a nondual explanation of the nature of our dynamic reality—when approaching their queries from such disparate angles? Like Bohr’s complementarity\, Basil and Jena may evidence that seemingly oppositional explanations of a phenomenon might be the fullest way to describe that phenomenon. \n\n\n\nBasil Hiley will introduce us to his latest discoveries on the structure of the universe and how they relate to the quantum potential\, a central concept of the de Broglie-Bohm formulation from David Bohm’s 1952 paper\, A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden’ Variables\, which was later expanded upon by Bohm and Hiley. Jena will interject as Basil’s mathematical points become too abstract for a lay audience\, and will redirect the discussion back toward the real world practical application and meaning of these concepts! \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nTo see the Full Dualities Program\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nProfessor Basil Hiley\, collaborator and colleague of David Bohm for over 30 years Basil J. Hiley is a British quantum physicist and professor emeritus of the University of London. He received the Majorana Prize ‘Best Person in Physics’ in 2012. A long-time co-worker of David Bohm\, Hiley is known for his collaboration with Bohm on the implicate order and for his work on algebraic descriptions of quantum physics in terms of underlying symplectic and orthogonal Clifford algebras. Hiley co-authored the book The Undivided Universe with David Bohm\, which is considered the main reference for Bohm’s interpretation of quantum theory. \n\n\n\nThe work of Bohm and Hiley has been characterized as primarily addressing the question ‘whether we can have an adequate conception of the reality of a quantum system\, be this causal or be it stochastic or be it of any other nature’ and meeting the scientific challenge of providing a mathematical description of quantum systems that matches the idea of an implicate order. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPari Center Associate Director Jena Axelrod is the founder of Numena Productions LLC\, where she directs and produces surreal\, enlightening film\, television\, and web content. Premiering in 2022\, the documentary Absurdity of Certaintyfeatures Pari Center co-founder physicist-philosopher Dr F. David Peat. \n\n\n\nJena works as a comedian\, best known as Jena Not Jameson on Jackie Martling’s radio show on the Howard Stern channel at SiriusXM. Jena also works as a workshop facilitator for ThriveLoud\, and as a Sales Director at Ideal Prediction providing trade analytics services to banks\, hedge funds\, and cryptocurrency firms.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/duo-duels-on-non-duality-the-quantum-potential-and-the-nature-of-consciousness/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Dualities-e1643366193858.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220213T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220213T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20211221T180859Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240324T224953Z
UID:10000081-1644775200-1644782400@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:The Way Up and the Way Down: Dante and the One Path from Hell to Paradise
DESCRIPTION:The Way Up and the Way Down: Dante and the One Path from Hell to Paradise \n\n\n\nwith Mark Vernon \n\n\n\nSunday February 13\, 20229:00 PST | 12:00 EST | 17:00 GMT  |  18:00 CET \n\n\n\n2-hour session \n\n\n\nThe session is live and you will be sent the RECORDING. \n\n\n\nDante’s Divine Comedy famously opens with the poet wakening in a dark wood. His life has seemingly taken a wrong turn. But why must he embark first on a journey through hell\, before ascending Mount Purgatory\, only then entering paradise? What has the way into darkness to do with the way into light? He learns to say ‘yes’ to all of reality\, and that the light includes the darkness\, even as tragedy is integrated into the comedy of divine life. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nTo see the Full Dualities Program\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nMark Vernon is a writer and psychotherapist. He contributes to and presents programmes on the radio\, as well as writing for the national and religious press\, and online publications. He also podcasts\, in particular The Sheldrake-Vernon Dialogues with Rupert Sheldrake\, gives talks and leads workshops. He has a PhD in ancient Greek philosophy\, and other degrees in physics and in theology\, having studied at Durham\, Oxford and Warwick universities. He is the author of several books\, including A Secret History of Christianity: Jesus\, the Last Inkling and the Evolution of Consciousness which in part explores the work of Owen Barfield. He used to be an Anglican priest and lives in London\, UK. He is working on the notion of spiritual intelligence with the research group\, Perspectiva. Mark’s latest book is Dante’s Divine Comedy: A Guide for the Spiritual Journey\, Angelico Press\, 2021. For more information see www.markvernon.com.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/the-way-up-and-the-way-down-dante-and-the-one-path-from-hell-to-paradise/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/5-e1640780753371.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220219T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220219T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20211221T181904Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240324T161656Z
UID:10000083-1645293600-1645300800@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:Connecting the Actuality of Things in Space-Time to the Reality of Possibility in QuantumLand
DESCRIPTION:Connecting the Actuality of Things in Space-Time to the Reality of Possibility in QuantumLand \n\n\n\nConvergences in Quantum Physics\, Brain Science\, Philosophy and Mystical Thought \n\n\n\nwith Ruth E. Kastner and Gary Goldberg \n\n\n\nSaturday February 19\, 20229:00 PST | 12:00 EST | 17:00 GMT  |  18:00 CET \n\n\n\n2-hour session \n\n\n\nThe session is live and you will be sent the RECORDING. \n\n\n\nIn their joint presentation\, Ruth and Gary will examine convergent trends across multiple disciplines indicating a fundamental paradigm shift is necessary and underway.  The dominant Nominalistic perspective focuses only on phenomena that are detectable through empirical observation of discrete ‘things’ and ‘events’ situated in space-time\, and sees reality as exclusively constituted as such\, maintaining that potentiality is not real.  There is a fundamental ‘threat’ inherent in such a worldview. What is ignored—to our peril—is the underlying matrix of relational reality\, an ‘Implicate Order’ that sculpts out the possibilities that are offered for actualization out of a primordial flowing continuum\, a hidden potent realm of streaming quantum process that we will call ‘QuantumLand’ for reasons that will be explained. \n\n\n\nAs Hans Reichenbach insightfully remarked\, ‘the flow of time is a real becoming in which potentiality is transformed into actuality.’   Through time-dependent process\, the possibilities generated in the hidden relational quantum realm presage the physical actuality of our manifest phenomenal world.  Billions of years of biological evolution have conferred an ‘Actuality Instrument Panel’—ie. our physical senses\, that allow us to function—to ‘fly on instruments’\, so to speak\, through this veiled reality—as  embodied\, but fundamentally relational creatures.   \n\n\n\nA further assumption of the Western modern worldview is the notion that all action occurs via ‘billiard-ball’ mechanism\,  with isolated entities (ie. lone ‘monads’ without communicative capacity) traveling unilaterally through space-time\, thus precluding the possibility of any real\, two-way communication—ie. ‘trans-action’—between constituents.  According to this ‘modern’ perspective\, there is no mediating factor in between entities and the only logic applicable is classical and binary.  The Laws of Non-contradiction and Excluded Middle are in full force\, dictating intolerance for uncertainty.  Charles Sanders Peirce\, over 100 years ago warned of the dire deficiencies of this rigid perspective which he called ‘Necessitarianism‘\, with its championing of ‘hard determinism’\, and the denial of so-called ‘generals\,’  ‘potentiality’ and ‘free will.’   Necessitarianism is a ‘Yang-only’ understanding limited to the proliferative processes of generation\, initiation\, and creation.  Precluded are Yin-type selective processes: reception\, response\, growth and dissolution.   Yang involves an exclusive focus on ‘things’\, ‘relata’ that then come into ordering relationship.  Yin involves the ordering relations themselves. \n\n\n\nModern Western science continues to be dominated by ‘Yang-only’ prioritizing of relata over relations\, placing ‘things’ over the ‘connections’—the importance of which is minimized in the Yang mindset as being ‘mind-dependent’ and thus NOT real.   One important consequence is that an approach to field propagation that could shed new light on the physical meaning of quantum theory has been\, for many years\, overlooked.  What exactly is quantum theory trying to tell us about where we ‘moderns’ have gone wrong in our understanding of how the cosmos operates?   A viable alternative understanding places Yang and Yin processes into a configuration ofbalanced mutual complementarity rather than conflictual opposing polarities\, best understood by recognizing negotiated ‘transaction’\, of communicative interaction and informational exchange via relation\, as real and of fundamental significance.   Drawing on emerging concepts in brain science (the functional specialization of the two cerebral hemispheres in accordance with the divided brain theory of Iain McGilchrist)\, in philosophy (the turn toward ‘panpsychism’—implying that everything is conscious) and in mystical thought (the referenced yinyang concept of Chinese origin\, Kabbalistic principles\, beliefs of indigenous cultures\, etc)\, we develop the hypothesis implying that: \n\n\n\n\nEverything is conscious and has ‘free will’ to some extent (consistent with the Born Rule and ‘nomic grounding’)\,\n\n\n\nConsciousness is linked to agency\n\n\n\nAgency is linked to transaction understood as bidirectionally negotiated communicative interaction in which there is an actualenergetic exchange consistent with the principle of mass-energy-information equivalence ( see https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.5123794 ) between an ‘emitter’ and an ‘absorber’\, with the Possibilist/Relativistic version of the Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Physics implying that the available phenomenal level of our actual experience rests upon a vast oceanic continuum of possibility out of which the creative\, the unanticipated\, and the whole of physical actuality arises through a process occurring in QuantumLand involving an exchange of ‘active information’ via a hidden interaction involving an ‘offer wave’ from an ‘emitter’ entity traveling forward in time connecting with a ‘confirmation wave’ from an ‘absorber’ entity traveling backward in time to the originating ‘emitter.’\n\n\n\n\nThis\, we believe\, is the ultimate message that quantum theory is attempting to drive home. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nTo see the Full Dualities Program\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRuth E. Kastner earned her M.S. in Physics and Ph.D. in History and Philosophy of Science from the University of Maryland. Since that time\, she has taught widely and conducted research in Foundations of Physics\, particularly in interpretations of quantum theory. She is the author of 3 books: The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Theory: The Reality of Possibility (Cambridge University Press\, 2012; 2nd edition forthcoming in Fall 2021)\, Understanding Our Unseen Reality: Solving Quantum Riddles (Imperial College Press\, 2015); and Adventures In Quantumland: Exploring Our Unseen Reality (World Scientific\, 2019).  She has presented talks and interviews throughout the world and in video recordings on the interpretational challenges of quantum theory. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nGary Goldberg obtained a B.A.Sc. (bachelor of applied science) in electrical engineering science at the University of Toronto and his M.D. at McMaster University.  He completed specialty training in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and subsequently sub-specialized in Brain Injury Medicine.  He has worked and taught at academic medical centers in Philadelphia\, Toronto\, Pittsburgh and Richmond\, Virginia during the course of a nearly 40-year career in brain injury rehabilitation. He retired from active clinical participation in September\, 2020 to turn to other personal activities.  He has sustained an abiding interest in how neuroscience\, physical science\, as well as interpersonal experience and systems of belief examined through a semiotic relational lens have informed his work as well as his understanding of the human condition.  He currently serves as a Scientific Advisor to the Pari Center for New Learning.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/connecting-the-actuality-of-things-in-space-time-to-the-reality-of-possibility-in-quantumland/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/7-e1640780838157.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220220T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220220T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20211221T183004Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240324T162005Z
UID:10000085-1645380000-1645387200@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:Contraries and Human Existence: William Blake and Cleansing the Doors of Perceptions
DESCRIPTION:Contraries and Human Existence: William Blake and Cleansing the Doors of Perceptions \n\n\n\nwith Mark Vernon \n\n\n\nSunday February 20\, 20229:00 PST | 12:00 EST | 17:00 GMT  |  18:00 CET \n\n\n\n2-hour session \n\n\n\nThe session is live and you will be sent the RECORDING. \n\n\n\nSight is found in the struggles of life\, William Blake realised\, as his own life was lived between heaven and hell\, innocence and experience\, vision and labour. Opposites are the energy of the imagination and bring the power to see through surfaces. Blake offers maps that chart the transformation from the narrow sight of Ulro to the full embrace of Eternity. We will also consider the role of dualities in Romantic philosophers like Samuel Taylor Coleridge. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nTo see the Full Dualities Program\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nMark Vernon is a writer and psychotherapist. He contributes to and presents programmes on the radio\, as well as writing for the national and religious press\, and online publications. He also podcasts\, in particular The Sheldrake-Vernon Dialogues with Rupert Sheldrake\, gives talks and leads workshops. He has a PhD in ancient Greek philosophy\, and other degrees in physics and in theology\, having studied at Durham\, Oxford and Warwick universities. He is the author of several books\, including A Secret History of Christianity: Jesus\, the Last Inkling and the Evolution of Consciousness which in part explores the work of Owen Barfield. He used to be an Anglican priest and lives in London\, UK. He is working on the notion of spiritual intelligence with the research group\, Perspectiva. Mark’s latest book is Dante’s Divine Comedy: A Guide for the Spiritual Journey\, Angelico Press\, 2021. For more information see www.markvernon.com.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/contraries-and-human-existence-william-blake-and-cleansing-the-doors-of-perceptions/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/9-e1640780933703.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220223T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220223T193000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20220118T124824Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240424T081037Z
UID:10000144-1645639200-1645644600@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:The Future Scientist - A Conversation with Rupert Sheldrake
DESCRIPTION:Watch the recording \n\n\n\n\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpr0QP4Qcvk\n\n\n\n\n\nA Conversation between Rupert Sheldrake and Dr. Àlex Gómez-Marín \n\n\n\nWednesday February 239:00am PST  | 12:00pm EST  | 5:00pm GMT  |  6:00pm CET \n\n\n\nThe session is live and all registered participants will receive the RECORDING. \n\n\n\nA monthly virtual encounter to understand where science is going and to reimage where we hope it might go. \n\n\n\nIn this second session of the conversation series on “The Future Scientist”\, Dr. Àlex Gómez-Marín will be in conversation with Dr. Rupert Sheldrake. \n\n\n\nThe dialogue will be in a lively and spontaneous format of approximately 45 minutes up to an hour and we will then open up for questions from the audience. \n\n\n\nAfter a brief discussion of the issues raised by dogmatism within mainstream materialism and accusations of heresy by orthodox institutional science\, in this second conversation we will address weak points in contemporary science in areas that might be more promising for breakthroughs\, accelerating a change of paradigm already under way\, and leading to a more comprehensive and inclusive worldview. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDr Rupert Sheldrake is a biologist and author of more than ninety technical papers and nine books\, including The Science Delusion (called Science Set Free in the US). As a Fellow of Clare College\, Cambridge\, he was Director of Studies in Cell Biology\, and was also a Research Fellow of the Royal Society. He worked in Hyderabad\, India\, as Principal Plant Physiologist at the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)\, and also lived for two years in the ashram of Fr Bede Griffiths in Tamil Nadu. From 2005-2010\, he was Director of the Perrott-Warrick Project for the study of unexplained human and animal abilities\, funded by Trinity College\, Cambridge. He is currently a Fellow of the Institute of Noetic Sciences in Petaluma\, California and of Schumacher College in Dartington\, Devon. He lives in London and is married to Jill Purce\, with whom he has two sons. His web site is www.sheldrake.org. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDr Àlex Gómez-Marín is a theoretical physicist turned cognitive neuroscientist. He earned his PhD in Physics in 2008 from the University of Barcelona\, where we studied the microscopic origins of the arrow of time. He also holds a Masters in Biophysics from the same university. He was a Juan de la Cierva Fellow at the EMBL-CRG Centre for Genomic Regulation where he investigated the neurobiology of action and perception in fruit flies\, and a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Champalimaud Center for the Unknown in Lisbon\, Portugal\, where he deployed a computational ethology approach to establish neuro-ethological principles in worms\, flies and mice. Since 2016 he is the head of the Behavior of Organisms Laboratory at the Instituto de Neurociencias in Alicante\, Spain\, where he has been a Ramón y Cajal Fellow\, and where he currently is an Associate Professor of the Spanish Research Council. His latest research concentrates on consciousness and cognition in humans in real-world situations\, combining high-resolution experiments with theoretical biology and continental philosophy. He is the author of a number of research articles\, and he is shortly to publish his first book in Spanish on the ‘tales not told’ in current neuroscience. Born in Barcelona\, he now lives in the Mediterranean coast of Alicante and has two daughters and a cat. You can follow him on social media at @behaviOrganisms and read his work here: https://behavior-of-organisms.org/read-us \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThe Future Scientist Series\n\n\n\nScience as we know it is a relatively recent human invention. \n\n\n\nAfter the ‘scientific revolution’ of the seventeenth century\, science and philosophy remained entangled as ‘natural philosophy’ until they started to separate in the nineteenth century (the very word ‘scientist’ was coined in 1834). Subsequently\, science morphed from an activity carried out by wealthy people as a hobby (the ‘amateur\,’ in the etymological sense of the word) into a paid job within an institutionalized system (the ‘professional’). Paradoxically or not\, great ideas come more easily from people who are not paid to have them—it’s like forcing someone to be free\, or compelling creativity by an act of will. \n\n\n\nIn the last decades\, a series of technological and societal changes have further accelerated mutations of what it means to be a scientist; from the selection forces cast by neoliberalism on ‘scientific careers\,’ to the kind of ‘science in the age of selfies’ that social media promotes. Scientists too are prey to the perverse dynamics of nowadays ‘attention economy.’ To understand what scientists do and why they do it\, one must also understand the political and social contexts in which they live. \n\n\n\nIn addition\, the rise of ‘big science’—initially in physics (particle physics and astronomy)\, and subsequently in life and mind sciences (genomics\, and connectomics)—is reconfiguring the landscape typically inhabited by the romantic figure of the lone scientist receiving visions in dream-like states of consciousness and\, eventually\, advancing science in a stroke of genius. In turn\, the idea of the scientist bred in the current academe is that of a diligent caffeinated deluxe technician as a part within the larger mechanism of research group army; a person trained exquisitely (and almost exclusively) on a research aspect\, a specialist unable to keep track of what goes on beyond the narrow confines of his/her discipline. Young scientists are indeed trained to be good at following rules and procedures (explicit laboratory protocols\, but also implicit codes of conduct and metaphysical commitments) but discouraged to learn to see when and how to transcend them. \n\n\n\nIn turn\, the more recent promises of ‘big data’ and ‘artificial intelligence’ posit a near-future landscape where some of the core skills and tasks traditionally attributed to humans may be soon carried out by machines (or so the ‘scientific soteriologists’ claim). Algorithms are not just ingenious means to an end that require human intervention to imbue them with meaning\, but are swiftly becoming ends in themselves\, pretending they offer an automated unbiased interpretation of the data. \n\n\n\nA re-appraisal of the habits of the modern scientist entails an ethical dimension as well: why do we treat animals as objects (as means\, rather than ends in themselves)\, why do we study life in laboratories primarily by killing it\, and why do we study life in laboratories in the first place? These questions also reflect on ecological considerations regarding our place in nature (humans in relationship with other animals\, and other kingdoms of life) and our destruction of the planet. Francis Bacon’s prophetic vision of the Promethean scientist\, so vividly captured in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein\, has become both a cautionary tale and an inspiration. \n\n\n\nIn addition\, and despite the real ‘paradigm changes’ in physics at the beginning of the twentieth century\, other branches of science such as biology and neuroscience remain under the spell of philosophical promissory materialism. Research facts are sold in tandem with covert metaphysical commitments. The objective-subjective divide still puzzles both scientists and the layperson. The mind-body problem remains to be solved (or dissolved). \n\n\n\nIn sum\, the whole enterprise seems to be committed to suppressing broad thinkers\, promoting academics that look more like corporate managers\, PR mavericks and professional fund-raisers and less like scholars\, who are asked to inhibit their interest in philosophy\, and to cast suspicion on their fertile imagination. Dogma and habit are inhibiting free inquiry. \n\n\n\nIt is as if science as a whole is becoming less scientific. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nIn the face of this milieu of factors\, in this series of online events we seek to reflect on what ‘the future scientist’ may look like. This is an ambitious exercise indeed\, which goes beyond mere theoretical speculation. It is not unlikely that sooner than we think current science will be unrecognizable to most of us. The consequences for humanity writ large\, not just for scientists themselves\, are pressing. \n\n\n\nThe question at stake is whether by ‘future scientist’ we mean what scientists in the future are all likely to look like\, or what a future better scientist might look like. In our conversations we will engage more in prescribing than in predicting\, that is\, we might begin by describing where science is going (prediction) to then describe where we hope science might go (prescription). Attempting the art of ‘dia-logos\,’ we hope to express a creative voice that will enlighten the way of a new science in the twenty-first century. \n\n\n\nThe series will be direct conversations\, that is\, no formal presentation of the invited speaker but a kind of ‘thinking aloud’ in the mode of a dialogue between each guest and Àlex Gómez-Marín as the conversation host. The idea is to engage critically with various aspects of ‘the future scientist’ in a lively and spontaneous format for approximately 45 minutes to an hour\, followed by comments and questions from the audience. Each conversation will take place virtually\, on a Wednesday each month. \n\n\n\nThe invited speakers to The Future Scientist series are chosen not just as great interlocutors to discuss these issues\, but also as exemplars and hints of what ‘the future scientist’ may actually look like here and now.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/the-future-scientist-a-conversation-with-rupert-sheldrake/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Ig-posts-e1642518731767.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220226T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220226T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20211221T185950Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240314T202011Z
UID:10000087-1645898400-1645905600@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:Beyond Dualistic Mind: Journeying Together on David Bohm’s ‘No Road’
DESCRIPTION:with David Schrum \n\n\n\nSaturday February 26\, 2022 \n\n\n\n9:00 PST | 12:00 EST | 17:00 GMT  |  18:00 CET \n\n\n\n2-hour session \n\n\n\nThe session is live and you will be sent the RECORDING. \n\n\n\nThe Heart Sutra\, taken from ancient Buddhism\, concludes with this evocation of awakening\, “gone\, gone\, gone to the farthest shore….” \n\n\n\n‘This shore’ and ‘the other shore’\, nowadays\, have become common metaphors in spiritual discourse\, ‘this side’ (here) representing the field of fragmented mind with its conflict of opposing dualities; ‘the other side’ (there) reflecting wholeness; the gap between these two signifying the great divide between this and that. But\, as sages and mystics also have indicated\, when one reaches the other side\, he/she may find that it is this side—that always it has been this side\, but now is differently perceived. This journey to perception is the journey beyond duality. \n\n\n\nBut what is this voyage—practically\, beyond metaphor\, beyond verbal description and explanation? What might it be to touch onto the ‘other shore’ as an actuality? David Bohm worked to open these questions at depth. Over the years\, through talks\, writings\, and conversations\, he shared an invitation to enquiry into and observation of ourselves in a movement that is away from nothing but\, rather\, is into what is. What he sought to open is a journey intimately within\, which might well be characterized as “here\, here\, here upon the innermost shore.” Such exploration takes us beyond concepts\, words\, and their dualities. It leads us to preverbal territories which are in their nature without maps. It brings us to be way-finders on ‘no road’. \n\n\n\nHere is the field that we propose to open to together—tentatively\, subtly—considering both what Bohm and others have offered\, and that which we may come upon ourselves. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nTo see the Full Dualities Program\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDavid Schrum received his PhD in quantum theory at Queen’s University\, following which he spent two post-doctoral years with David Bohm at Birkbeck College. Here\, he entered Bohm’s world of creative and subtle philosophical approaches to physics and his enquiry into consciousness and what may lie beyond. \n\n\n\nDavid Schrum continues in these explorations\, in physics developing a new approach to relativistic quantum theory and\, through the dialogue process\, going into what it is to bring to light that which lies enfolded within our individual and collective consciousness.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/beyond-dualistic-mind-journeying-together-on-david-bohms-no-road/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/r-e1640781032854.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220227T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220227T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20211221T190955Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240324T223408Z
UID:10000089-1645984800-1645992000@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:The Master and the Emissary. Dualities in the Philosophy of Iain McGilchrist
DESCRIPTION:The Master and the Emissary. Dualities in the Philosophy of Iain McGilchrist \n\n\n\nwith Mark Vernon \n\n\n\nSunday February 27\, 20229:00 PST | 12:00 EST | 17:00 GMT  |  18:00 CET \n\n\n\n2-hour session \n\n\n\nThe session is live and you will be sent the RECORDING. \n\n\n\nThe recent work of the psychiatrist and philosopher\, Iain McGilchrist\, allows us to bring the role of dualities in spiritual perception right up to date. He has shown how brain lateralisation facilitates two types of perception. They are asymmetric\, both required in right relation for the fullest awareness of the world\, which is so often lacking in our times. In this session we will weave in insights from Carl Jung and process theology too. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nTo see the Full Dualities Program\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nMark Vernon is a writer and psychotherapist. He contributes to and presents programmes on the radio\, as well as writing for the national and religious press\, and online publications. He also podcasts\, in particular The Sheldrake-Vernon Dialogues with Rupert Sheldrake\, gives talks and leads workshops. He has a PhD in ancient Greek philosophy\, and other degrees in physics and in theology\, having studied at Durham\, Oxford and Warwick universities. He is the author of several books\, including A Secret History of Christianity: Jesus\, the Last Inkling and the Evolution of Consciousness which in part explores the work of Owen Barfield. He used to be an Anglican priest and lives in London\, UK. He is working on the notion of spiritual intelligence with the research group\, Perspectiva. Mark’s latest book is Dante’s Divine Comedy: A Guide for the Spiritual Journey\, Angelico Press\, 2021. For more information see www.markvernon.com.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/the-master-and-the-emissary-dualities-in-the-philosophy-of-iain-mcgilchrist/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/13-e1640781110276.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220228T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220228T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20220120T221944Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240424T081000Z
UID:10000146-1646071200-1646078400@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:Music and Numbers
DESCRIPTION:Watch the recording\n\n\n\n\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-0cy1RkTa8\n\n\n\n\n\na webinar produced\, presented\, and performed by \n\n\n\nDr Donna Coleman \n\n\n\nand Special Guest Dr Kevin March \n\n\n\nStreaming from Studio OutBach® Santa Fe\, situated in the heart of the deep Indigenous history of Native New Mexico\, from ancient Paleoindians to Keres- and Tanoan-speaking peoples who were raided by the Comanches. \n\n\n\nMonday February 28 \n\n\n\n9:00am PST  | 12:00pm EST  | 5:00pm GMT  |  6:00pm CETTuesday March 1 at 4:00am AEST (Australia) \n\n\n\nFree Online Pari Dialogue \n\n\n\n“The theory of Relativity occurred to me by intuition\, and music was the driving force behind that intuition. My parents had me study the violin from the time I was six. My discovery was the result of musical perception.”Albert Einstein \n\n\n\nquintessence n. 1. The pure\, highly concentrated essence of something. 2. The purest or most typical instance: “thou fiery-faced quintessence of all that is abominable!” (Poe). 3. Ancient & Medieval Philosophy. The fifth and highest essence (after the four elements of earth\, air\, fire\, and water)\, thought to be the substance of the heavenly bodies and latent in all things. [Middle English\, from Old French quinte essence\, from Medieval Latin quinta essentia (translation of Greek pempte ousia\, fifth essence) : Latin quinta\, feminine of quintus\, fifth (see penkwe in Appendix*) + essentia\, ESSENCE.]One of the first philosophers believed to have described the relationship between music and numbers was Pythagoras (c. 570–c. 490 BCE)\, who in fact wrote nothing himself. The first written accounts of his apparent postulates date from the third century CE. For a comprehensive discourse on the “problem of Pythagoras\,” see the article by Carl Huffman in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Suggested Reading\, below). \n\n\n\nNevertheless\, Pythagoras is credited with having distinguished\, by plucking strings of various lengths\, the relationships between the wavelengths of sound that define musical intervals and thence identified the harmonic or overtone series. The harmonic series\, which is a phenomenon of pure physics\, begins with a fundamental (the original wavelength of the plucked string)\, which subdivides proportionately\, first in half (to produce the first octave)\, in half again (the next higher octaves)\, and on and on\, to ultimately produce all of the pitches of the diatonic scale. These principles are believed to govern the development of polyphony (many layers of voices) from monophony (a single line of music\, as Gregorian Chant). The number five plays a prominent role in this evolution. \n\n\n\nThis two-hour\, fully interactive webinar will introduce the harmonic series and the musical intervals produced by it; the way a scale and its associated harmonic scheme and thence\, the musical structures that depend upon this harmony\, are derived from it; consider the significance and symbolism of the number five (quinta; cinque) and the so-called “fifth element” in the realm of music; discuss the notion of cadence and its role in Western European Art Music structures; explore the role of the Fibonacci Series [Fibonacci = contraction of Filius Bonacci\, aka Leonardo Bonacci or Leonardo Bigolio Pisano\, Italian mathematician born and died in Pisa c. 1170–1250 CE] in musical structure; and analyse and present in performance the music of several composers\, beginning\, as always\, with Johann Sebastian Bach\, discussing the interval relationships in Das Wohltemperierte Klavier  Vol. I Prelude in C major BWV 846. We will explore tonality as it relates to consonance and dissonance\, and introduce music that seeks to avoid tonality through non-repetition of tones\, by American composers Ruth Porter Crawford and Carl Sprague Ruggles by a process called Dissonation (by non-repetition of tones).A special feature of this webinar will be the participation\, from Australia at 5:00 a.m.\, of my esteemed colleague and friend\, Dr Kevin March\, with whom I have been collaborating on a project for the past two years to create a series of musical compositions inspired by the Fantod Pack by the American author\, illustrator\, and costume designer Edward Gorey (1925 Chicago – 2000 Cape Cod MA). I gave the World Premiere of two of these works for the Sadie Hawkins Day concert in Melbourne on 29th February 2020. For this webinar\, Kevin and I will discuss the role of the Fibonacci series in the choice of harmonies\, phrase lengths\, and other aspects of the structure of the piece entitled The Stones\, for which this performance is the WORLD PREMIERE. \n\n\n\nParticipants are encouraged to engage with questions\, comments\, and insights throughout the session\, which can be lodged in the Chat or via a “raised hand” in this ZOOM presentation. The second half of the webinar\, during which Dr March and Dr Coleman will engage in conversation about The Stones will be fully open for Q&A throughout. \n\n\n\nRepertory to be explored on this leg of the Quintessence of Music journey: \n\n\n\n\nJohann Sebastian Bach: Das Wolhtempierte Klavier\, I\, Prelude in C major\, BWV 846\n\n\n\nRuth Porter Crawford: Prelude No. 6 (1924)\n\n\n\nCarl Sprague Ruggles: Evocation No. 2 (1943)\n\n\n\nKevin March: Fantod Pack (2020–2022 for Donna Coleman)\, The Stones\n\n\n\n\nOn Monday February 28\, Donna will open our monthly monthly musical and philosophical journey  with a presentation and followed by discussion and Q&A. \n\n\n\nTHIS EVENT IS FREE AND OPEN TO EVERYONE! \n\n\n\nJoin our Zoom meeting via the following link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83468133210 \n\n\n\nIf you would like to participate\, have any questions or need any help just contact Eleanor Peat: eleanor@paricenter.com \n\n\n\nPLEASE NOTE THAT THIS SESSION IS THE FIRST OF TWO (possibly THREE) on this topic! \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nSuggested Reading\n\n\n\nCavanagh\, Lynn. A Brief History of the Establishment of International Standard Pitch A=440 Hertz. Online. https://www.wam.hr/sadrzaj/us/Cavanagh_440Hz.pdf \n\n\n\nGann\, Kyle. An Introduction to Historical Tunings. Online. https://www.kylegann.com/histune.html \n\n\n\nHemholtz\, Hermann L.F.\, M.D. On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music. London: Spottiswood and Co.\, 1885. PDF online. https://ia600208.us.archive.org/25/items/onsensationston00unkngoog/onsensationston00unkngoog.pdf \n\n\n\nHuffman\, Carl. “Pythagoras.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition)\, Edward N. Zalta\, editor. Online. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/pythagoras/. \n\n\n\nKlein\, Jürgen and Guido Giglioni\, “Francis Bacon\,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy   (Fall 2020 edition)\, Edward N. Zalta\, editor. Specific to this discussion\, see 3.3 Matter Theory and Cosmology. Online. \n\n\n\n\nhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/francis-bacon/#MatTheCos\n\n\n\n\nor \n\n\n\n\nhttps://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/francis-bacon\n\n\n\n\nPorterfield\, Richard. Melodic Function and Modal Processes in Gregorian Chant. PhD Dissertation. New York: City University of New York\, 2014. Online. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1091&context=gc_etds \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDonna Coleman is a multi-award-winning concert pianist\, recording artist\, author\, performance researcher and philosopher\, and master teacher whose career spans a half-century\, of which more than half has been based in Australia. She is also an accomplished weaver and photographer and an amateur but passionate astronomer and archaeologist with a keen interest in the culture of the Indigenous peoples of Australia and the United States. As Head of Keyboard and of Postgraduate Studies at the Victorian College of the Arts in Melbourne\, she convened weekly thought-provoking seminars that explored relationships between music and other disciplines. Donna is writing a book entitled Dancing with the Piano\, a collection of essays distilled from these sessions and from her many years of phenomenological engagement with her ultimate dance partner\, the piano. \n\n\n\nKevin March is an award-winning composer whose works have been performed in North America\, Australia\, and Europe by Victorian Opera\, Opéra de Montréal\, Pacific Opera Victoria\, Edmonton Opera\, One Ounce Opera\, PLEXUS\, the Tasmanian Symphony Orchestra\, Orchestra Victoria\, Ironwood Ensemble\, Halcyon\, The Arcko Ensemble\, the ASTRA Chamber Music Society\, the New York City Opera\, and by renowned performers Donna Coleman\, Nicole Car\, Étienne Dupuis\, Gino Quilico\, Stefan Cassomenos\, Sarah Curro\, and others. \n\n\n\nHis fifth opera\, Echo & Narcissus\, commissioned by Victorian Opera\, premiered in March 2021 to positive reviews. The Sydney Morning Herald called it ” … delicate and enigmatic and often ravishingly beautiful.”  His previous opera\, Les Feluettes (The Lilies)\, commissioned by Opéra du Montréal\, premiered in May 2016 to sold-out audiences\, standing ovations\, and rave reviews\, and was nominated for a coveted Opus Award. Les Feluettes received two further productions\, Pacific Opera Victoria and Edmonton Opera\, which received two Sterling Award nominations. \n\n\n\nOther awards include First Prize in the 3MBS National Composer Awards for his orchestral work The Flowering and the Dorian La Gallienne Prize for his setting of the Rimbaud poem Ophélie. His song cycle\, Songs of Remembrance and Resistance\, was nominated for Outstanding Original Composition in the 2018 Austin Critics Table Awards. His music has been broadcast on ABC Classic FM and 3MBS radio. It has featured in the Metropolis New Music Festival and the 7th Sydney Biennale\, and in the ABC Radio National documentary Modern Muses: The Greeks and New Music. \n\n\n\nHis most recent work\, Electric Cathedral\, created in collaboration with Virtual Reality artist and poet reVerse Butcher and poet Kylie Supski\, received a grant from The Australia Council for the Arts.  He has also received creative grants from Vic Arts\, the University of Michigan\, and ArtServe Michigan. \n\n\n\nScores for many of Kevin’s compositions are available through Wirripang Publishing and the Australian Music Centre. \n\n\n\nKevin holds a Master’s degree and a Doctorate from the University of Michigan where his principal composition instructors were William Bolcom\, William Albright\, Michael Daugherty and Curtis Curtis-Smith. In Australia\, he has been mentored by notable Australian composers Richard Mills\, Gerard Brophy\, Maria Grenfell\, and Paul Stanhope.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/music-and-numbers/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/file-20170622-11976-j3rkz2-e1642869050803.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220305T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220305T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20211229T125015Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240324T172724Z
UID:10000093-1646503200-1646510400@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:Jung’s Two Personalities: Psychological Implications
DESCRIPTION:Jung’s Two Personalities: Psychological Implications \n\n\n\nwith Mark Saban \n\n\n\nSaturday March 5\, 20229:00 PST | 12:00 EST | 17:00 GMT  |  18:00 CET \n\n\n\n2-hour session \n\n\n\nThe session is live and you will be sent the RECORDING. \n\n\n\nIn his book\, Two Souls Alas: Jung’s Two Personalities and the Making of Analytical Psychology (2019)\, Mark Saban looksinto the way Jung uses his memoir to describe the experience of having two personalities. Saban argues there that Jung’s experience of the dynamic between these two personalities informs basic principles behind the development of Jung’s psychological model and indeed Jung’s entire mature psychology. He suggests that what Jung took from this experience was the principle that psychological health required the avoidance of one-sidedness and that this was achieved through the experience of tension between what Jung described as two conflicting personalities. It was this dynamic that powered Jung’s notion of individuation. In short\, any one-sided position needs to be brought into tension with a conflicting ‘opposite’ position\, in order that a third position can be achieved which transcends both of the earlier positions. This latter operation Jung called the Transcendent Function.In this talk\, Saban will open up this notion\, showing how it operates within both psychotherapeutic work and wider cultural and political spheres. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nTo see the Full Dualities Program\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nMark Saban PhD worked for 20 years as an actor and performer before training with the Independent Group of Analytical Psychologists\, with whom he is a senior analyst. He is also a lecturer in Jungian and post-Jungian studies in the Department of Psychosocial and Psychoanalytic Studies\, University of Essex. \n\n\n\nPublications: Mark co-edited (with Emilija Kiehl and Andrew Samuels) Analysis and Activism – Social and Political Contributions of Jungian Psychology (Routledge 2016) and wrote Two Souls Alas: Jung’s Two Personalities and the Making of Analytical Psychology (Chiron 2019) which won the International Association of Jungian Studies’ Best Book of 2019. \n\n\n\ns the 2019 Zürich Lecture Series at the International School of Analytical Psychology. Based on his Ph.D. thesis\, the book was published by Chiron in 2019.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/jungs-two-personalities-psychological-implications/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Dualities-2-e1643366106108.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220306T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220306T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20211226T155535Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240324T163335Z
UID:10000091-1646589600-1646596800@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:Dualities and Non-Duality
DESCRIPTION:Dualities and Non-Duality \n\n\n\nwith Mauro Bergonzi and Shantena Sabbadini \n\n\n\nSunday March 6\, 20229:00 PST | 12:00 EST | 17:00 GMT  |  18:00 CET \n\n\n\n2-hour session \n\n\n\nThe session is live and you will be sent the RECORDING. \n\n\n\nWhat is the ultimate nature of reality? In our contemporary scientific culture reality appears to consist of a multiplicity of interacting parts. That multiplicity exhibits some fundamental dualities: being and becoming\, particle and field\, mind and matter. \n\n\n\nOn the other hand the main stance of non-duality (advaita in sanskrit) points to the simple fact that in reality there are endless differences\, but no separation at all: reality is regarded as an indivisible whole\, while the perception of isolated entities is just a mental construct without any cogent ontological foundation (including the idea of a separate ‘ego’ dwelling ‘within’ a single body/mind). \n\n\n\nNot even the boundary between subject and object is real: according to non-duality\, the opposing terms ‘consciousness’ and ‘world’ are just two different conceptual descriptions (in terms of the ‘first’ or of the ‘third’ person) of one and the same indivisible reality\, just as ‘ascent’ and ‘descent’ are two different words for the same slope\, depending which way one is going. So the alleged separation between ‘subject’ and ‘object’ is only an illusory mental construct. \n\n\n\nThis non-dual perspective has unfolded through a wide range of different forms not only in Eastern thought (mahāyāna buddhism\, advaita-vedānta\, tantrism\, daoism\, etc)\, but also in Western philosophical tradition\, albeit frequently in more implicit forms (e.g Parmenides\, Plotinus\, Cusanus\, Berkeley\, Spinoza\, Shelling or even Hegel)\, which may engender new prospects of dialogue with some challenging issues of contemporary scientific thought. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nTo see the Full Dualities Program\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nMauro Bergonzi taught “Religions and Philosophies of India” and “General Psychology” from 1985 to 2017 at the University of Naples “L’Orientale”.  He is also a member of  I.A.A.P. (International Association for Analytical Psychology) and of C.I.P.A. (Centro Italiano di Psicologia Analitica). He is author of academic essays and articles on Oriental Philosophies\, Comparative Religion\, Comparative Philosophy\, Psychology of Mysticism and Transpersonal Psychology. Since 1970\, for about 25 years he has been practicing  meditation (mainly within Buddhist\, Taoist and Vedānta traditions)\, always preserving a non-confessional and non-dogmatic approach\, until only a radical non-duality prevailed. From then on\, he has been regularly invited to lead spiritual groups in Italy. A survey of his non-dual communication is available in his book Il sorriso segreto dell’essere (Mondadori) and in his website: https://sites.google.com/site/ilsorrisodellessere/. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nShantena Augusto Sabbadini graduated from the University of Milan in 1968 and was awarded his PhD in physics from the University of California in 1976. In Milan he researched the foundations of quantum physics\, laying the base for what is currently known as the decoherence interpretation of quantum physics. At the University of California\, he contributed to the theoretical work behind the first identification of a black hole\, the X-ray source Cygnus X-1. In the 1990s he was scientific consultant for the Eranos Foundation\, an East-West research center founded under the auspices of C.G. Jung in the 1930s. In that context he produced various translations and commentaries of Chinese classics in Italian and English\, including the Yijing and the trilogy of Daoist classics\, the Laozi\, the Zhuangzi and the Liezi. From 2002 onwards he collaborated with F. David Peat running the Pari Center for New Learning and in 2017 he succeeded his friend and colleague as director of the center. \n\n\n\nShantena leads workshops and courses on the philosophical implications of quantum physics\, on Daoism\, and on using the Yijing as a tool for introspection. His most recent book in English\, Pilgrimages to Emptiness: Rethinking Reality through Quantum Physics\, was published by Pari Publishing in 2017.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/dualities-and-non-duality/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Dualities-3-e1643366020793.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220323T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220323T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20220311T105025Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240424T080406Z
UID:10000156-1648058400-1648065600@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:An Introduction to Gregory Bateson’s Ecology of Mind
DESCRIPTION:Watch the recording\n\n\n\n\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KePJVhhOELA\n\n\n\n\n\nAn Introduction to Gregory Bateson’s Ecology of Mind \n\n\n\nwith Jon Goodbun \n\n\n\nWednesday March 2310:00am PDT  | 1:00pm EDT  | 5:00pm GMT  |  6:00pm CET \n\n\n\nFree Online Pari Dialogue \n\n\n\nJon Goodbun’s research focuses on ‘ecological thinking’—both in terms of how we think about ecological systems\, and how ecological systems themselves think—drawing in particular on his extensive study of the work of the ecological anthropologist Gregory Bateson. In this talk Goodbun will introduce some of the history and thinking of this important theorist\, drawing in particular upon some of the ideas contained within his first collection of essays: Steps to an Ecology of Mind\, as well as his later synthesis: Mind and Nature—A Necessary Unity\, and his final incomplete text\, published after his death by daughter Mary Catherine Bateson\, called Angels Fear—Towards an Epistemology of the Sacred\, and will situate these ideas in relation to more recent research\, and the wider research interests of the Pari Center. \n\n\n\nOn Wednesday March 23\, Dr. Goodbun will open our monthly Community Call with a presentation and followed by discussion and Q&A. \n\n\n\nTHIS EVENT IS FREE AND OPEN TO EVERYONE! \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDr Jon Goodbun is mostly based in Athens\, Greece where he runs Rheomode\, a small experimental studio working and writing at the intersection of art\, architecture\, and ecological pedagogy\, although he also contributes to the MA Environmental Architecture at the Royal College of Art in London and the architecture and landscape programmes at University College London. His 2011 PhD\, ‘Critical Urban Ecologies: The Architecture of the Extended Mind\,’ drew together thinking on ecological and complex systems theory\, together with cognitive science and consciousness studies\, in relation to aesthetic theory\, spatial perception and ecological empathy\, and he is currently working on a book called The Ecological Calculus\, which builds on this work. He spent some time at the Pari Center in 2010\, interviewing David Peat about his own work\, and the work of his collaborator David Bohm (from whose work Goodbun borrowed the name ‘rheomode’ for his blog and studio!).
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/an-introduction-to-gregory-batesons-ecology-of-mind/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Neuro-Arboriculture-igor-morski.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220330T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220330T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20220217T123214Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240424T080833Z
UID:10000154-1648663200-1648670400@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:The Future Scientist – A Conversation with Michel Bitbol
DESCRIPTION:Watch the recording\n\n\n\n\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N48vkz4qrgw\n\n\n\n\n\nA Conversation between Dr. Michel Bitbol and Dr. Àlex Gómez-Marín \n\n\n\nWednesday March 309:00am PDT  | 12:00pm EDT  | 5:00pm BST  |  6:00pm CEST \n\n\n\nThe session is live and all registered participants will receive the RECORDING. \n\n\n\nA monthly virtual encounter to understand where science is going and to reimage where we hope it might go. \n\n\n\nThe dialogue will be in a lively and spontaneous format of approximately 45 minutes up to an hour and we will then open up for questions from the audience. \n\n\n\nUntil the advent of quantum mechanics\, physical sciences had thrived on the separation between object and subject that seems to provide “a view from nowhere”. At the same time\, current life and mind sciences still struggle with experiments and theories in which the primacy of felt experience does not seem to matter. In this third conversation of the series we will draw from the phenomenological tradition to explore the feasibility of a new kind of science in which human consciousness is placed at the center. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nMichel Bitbol is emeritus researcher at CNRS/École Normale Supérieure\, Paris\, France. He received a M.D.\, a Ph.D. in physics and a “Habilitation” in philosophy. After a start in scientific research\, he turned to philosophy of science\, editing texts by Erwin Schrödinger and formulating a philosophy of quantum mechanics based on phenomenological and neo-kantian conceptions. He then studied the relations between physics and the philosophy of mind\, as well as a first-person conception of consciousness arising from an experience of the phenomenological Epoché. More recently\, he engaged a debate with the philosophical movement called “speculative realism”\, from the same standpoint. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDr Àlex Gómez-Marín is a Spanish physicist turned neuroscientist. He holds a PhD in theoretical physics and a Masters in biophysics from the University of Barcelona. He was a research fellow at the EMBL-CRG Centre for Genomic Regulation and at the Champalimaud Center for the Unknown in Lisbon. His research spans from the origins of the arrow of time to the neurobiology of action-perception in flies\, worms\, mice\, humans and robots. Since 2016 he is the head of the Behavior of Organisms Laboratory at the Instituto de Neurociencias in Alicante\, where he is an Associate Professor of the Spanish Research Council. Combining high-resolution experiments\, computational and theoretical biology\, and continental philosophy\, his latest research concentrates on real-life cognition and consciousness. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThe Future Scientist Series\n\n\n\nScience as we know it is a relatively recent human invention. \n\n\n\nAfter the ‘scientific revolution’ of the seventeenth century\, science and philosophy remained entangled as ‘natural philosophy’ until they started to separate in the nineteenth century (the very word ‘scientist’ was coined in 1834). Subsequently\, science morphed from an activity carried out by wealthy people as a hobby (the ‘amateur\,’ in the etymological sense of the word) into a paid job within an institutionalized system (the ‘professional’). Paradoxically or not\, great ideas come more easily from people who are not paid to have them—it’s like forcing someone to be free\, or compelling creativity by an act of will. \n\n\n\nIn the last decades\, a series of technological and societal changes have further accelerated mutations of what it means to be a scientist; from the selection forces cast by neoliberalism on ‘scientific careers\,’ to the kind of ‘science in the age of selfies’ that social media promotes. Scientists too are prey to the perverse dynamics of nowadays ‘attention economy.’ To understand what scientists do and why they do it\, one must also understand the political and social contexts in which they live. \n\n\n\nIn addition\, the rise of ‘big science’—initially in physics (particle physics and astronomy)\, and subsequently in life and mind sciences (genomics\, and connectomics)—is reconfiguring the landscape typically inhabited by the romantic figure of the lone scientist receiving visions in dream-like states of consciousness and\, eventually\, advancing science in a stroke of genius. In turn\, the idea of the scientist bred in the current academe is that of a diligent caffeinated deluxe technician as a part within the larger mechanism of research group army; a person trained exquisitely (and almost exclusively) on a research aspect\, a specialist unable to keep track of what goes on beyond the narrow confines of his/her discipline. Young scientists are indeed trained to be good at following rules and procedures (explicit laboratory protocols\, but also implicit codes of conduct and metaphysical commitments) but discouraged to learn to see when and how to transcend them. \n\n\n\nIn turn\, the more recent promises of ‘big data’ and ‘artificial intelligence’ posit a near-future landscape where some of the core skills and tasks traditionally attributed to humans may be soon carried out by machines (or so the ‘scientific soteriologists’ claim). Algorithms are not just ingenious means to an end that require human intervention to imbue them with meaning\, but are swiftly becoming ends in themselves\, pretending they offer an automated unbiased interpretation of the data. \n\n\n\nA re-appraisal of the habits of the modern scientist entails an ethical dimension as well: why do we treat animals as objects (as means\, rather than ends in themselves)\, why do we study life in laboratories primarily by killing it\, and why do we study life in laboratories in the first place? These questions also reflect on ecological considerations regarding our place in nature (humans in relationship with other animals\, and other kingdoms of life) and our destruction of the planet. Francis Bacon’s prophetic vision of the Promethean scientist\, so vividly captured in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein\, has become both a cautionary tale and an inspiration. \n\n\n\nIn addition\, and despite the real ‘paradigm changes’ in physics at the beginning of the twentieth century\, other branches of science such as biology and neuroscience remain under the spell of philosophical promissory materialism. Research facts are sold in tandem with covert metaphysical commitments. The objective-subjective divide still puzzles both scientists and the layperson. The mind-body problem remains to be solved (or dissolved). \n\n\n\nIn sum\, the whole enterprise seems to be committed to suppressing broad thinkers\, promoting academics that look more like corporate managers\, PR mavericks and professional fund-raisers and less like scholars\, who are asked to inhibit their interest in philosophy\, and to cast suspicion on their fertile imagination. Dogma and habit are inhibiting free inquiry. \n\n\n\nIt is as if science as a whole is becoming less scientific. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nIn the face of this milieu of factors\, in this series of online events we seek to reflect on what ‘the future scientist’ may look like. This is an ambitious exercise indeed\, which goes beyond mere theoretical speculation. It is not unlikely that sooner than we think current science will be unrecognizable to most of us. The consequences for humanity writ large\, not just for scientists themselves\, are pressing. \n\n\n\nThe question at stake is whether by ‘future scientist’ we mean what scientists in the future are all likely to look like\, or what a future better scientist might look like. In our conversations we will engage more in prescribing than in predicting\, that is\, we might begin by describing where science is going (prediction) to then describe where we hope science might go (prescription). Attempting the art of ‘dia-logos\,’ we hope to express a creative voice that will enlighten the way of a new science in the twenty-first century. \n\n\n\nThe series will be direct conversations\, that is\, no formal presentation of the invited speaker but a kind of ‘thinking aloud’ in the mode of a dialogue between each guest and Àlex Gómez-Marín as the conversation host. The idea is to engage critically with various aspects of ‘the future scientist’ in a lively and spontaneous format for approximately 45 minutes to an hour\, followed by comments and questions from the audience. Each conversation will take place virtually\, on a Wednesday each month. \n\n\n\nThe invited speakers to The Future Scientist series are chosen not just as great interlocutors to discuss these issues\, but also as exemplars and hints of what ‘the future scientist’ may actually look like here and now.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/the-future-scientist-a-conversation-with-michel-bitbol/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/The-Future-Scientist-e1645102574360.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220406T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220406T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20220324T174436Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240317T201802Z
UID:10000158-1649268000-1649275200@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:Music and Numbers\, Part II
DESCRIPTION:Watch the recording\n\n\n\n\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uG0La1b-QuQ\n\n\n\n\n\na webinar produced\, presented\, and performed by \n\n\n\nDr Donna Coleman \n\n\n\nStreaming from Studio OutBach® Santa Fe\, situated in the heart of the deep Indigenous history of Native New Mexico\, from ancient Paleoindians to Keres- and Tanoan-speaking peoples who were raided by the Comanches. \n\n\n\nWednesday April 6 \n\n\n\n9:00am PDT  | 12:00pm EDT  | 5:00pm BST  |  6:00pm CESTThursday April 7 at 2:00am AEST (Australia) \n\n\n\n“What is above is as what is below.”The Book of Thoth \n\n\n\nThis session will continue the journey we began in Music and Numbers\, Part I. Having embarked upon the landscape comprised of dissonant intervals and avoidance of tonality\, we will explore the music of composers working with the so-called Twelve-Tone System: Riccardo Malipiero\, Anton Webern\, and Luigi Dallapiccola\, for whom numbers provided the pathway to their idiosyncratic musical languages. We will begin by considering the way interval relationships in Johann Sebastian Bach’s Sinfonia in F minor create what we know as consonance and compare it to Riccardo Malipiero’s (1914 Milan – 2003 Milan) Invenzione #7\, a dissonant work that is modelled upon it. Dr Coleman will demonstrate the way Webern created 144 possible versions of his twelve-tone row using the Magic Square. \n\n\n\nRepertory to be explored on this leg of the Quintessence of Music journey: \n\n\n\nJohann Sebastian Bach: Sinfonia in F minor\, BWV 795 (1723)Riccardo Malipiero: Invenzioni\, No. 7 (1949)Anton Webern: Variationen für Klavier\, opus 27 (1936)Luigi Dallapiccola: Quaderno Musicale di Annalibera (1952) \n\n\n\nThe discussion will also dwell upon traditional number attributes\, delving back to the Sephiroth of the ancient Qabalah\, the significance of the ten numbers assigned to the branches of the Tree of Life\, its seven planes\, twenty-two intersections\, and the hermetic adaptation of these into the Tarot. As always\, we will look for the meaning behind all of these inter-related manifestations of the Ethereal Universe. \n\n\n\nOn Wednesday April 6\, Donna will open our monthly monthly musical and philosophical journey  with a presentation and followed by discussion and Q&A. \n\n\n\nTHIS EVENT IS FREE AND OPEN TO EVERYONE! \n\n\n\nJoin our Zoom meeting via the following link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83082713624 \n\n\n\nIf you would like to participate\, have any questions or need any help just contact Eleanor Peat: eleanor@paricenter.com \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nSuggested Reading\n\n\n\n\nCrowley\, Alistair. The Book of Thoth: A Short Essay on the Tarot of the Egyptians\, Being the Equinox Volume III No. V. Newburyport MA: Samuel Weiser\, Inc.\, 1974. https://echoesofegypt.peabody.yale.edu/egyptosophy/fragments-book-thoth\n\n\n\n———. Crowley Thoth Tarot Deck. http://www.thule-italia.net/esoterismo/Aleister%20Crowley/Crowley%20Thoth%20Tarot%20Deck.pdf\n\n\n\nMorris\, Robert. Mathematics and the Twelve-Tone System. https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/229011/mod_resource/content/1/Mathematics%20and%20the%20Twelve-Tone%20System%20(Morris%202007).pdf\n\n\n\nPapus. The Tarot of the Bohemians. https://www.labirintoermetico.com/02tarocchi/papus_the_tarot_of_the_bohemians.pdf\n\n\n\nTufts University Faculty (unnamed). Twelve-Tone Technique: A Primer. https://sites.tufts.edu/markdevoto/files/2015/10/12TonePrimer.pdf\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDonna Coleman is a multi-award-winning concert pianist\, recording artist\, author\, performance researcher and philosopher\, and master teacher whose career spans a half-century\, of which more than half has been based in Australia. She is also an accomplished weaver and photographer and an amateur but passionate astronomer and archaeologist with a keen interest in the culture of the Indigenous peoples of Australia and the United States. As Head of Keyboard and of Postgraduate Studies at the Victorian College of the Arts in Melbourne\, she convened weekly thought-provoking seminars that explored relationships between music and other disciplines. Donna is writing a book entitled Dancing with the Piano\, a collection of essays distilled from these sessions and from her many years of phenomenological engagement with her ultimate dance partner\, the piano.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/music-and-numbers-part-2/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/1-The-Music-of-ProofPurple-e1648212023133.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220413T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220413T193000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20220405T202241Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240423T211127Z
UID:10000170-1649872800-1649878200@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:Teaching the Dinosaur to Dance: Moving Beyond Business as Usual
DESCRIPTION:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNDpL1S2fLY\n\n\n\n\n\nTeaching the Dinosaur to Dance: Moving Beyond Business as Usual \n\n\n\nDonna Kennedy-Glans in conversation with Julie Arts \n\n\n\nWednesday April 13 9:00am PDT  | 12:00pm EDT  | 5:00pm BST  |  6:00pm CEST \n\n\n\nFree Online Pari Dialogue \n\n\n\nDonna’s latest book Teaching the Dinosaur to Dance provides the roadmap builders and rebuilders—of society and of enterprise—with the tools to rethink\, redesign and revitalize their organizations and to remain relevant and sustainable in a new and very different future. Business as usual is extinct. Disruption and social pressure are the new norm and change is inevitable for enterprises of all kinds—businesses\, governments\, non-profits\, community initiatives and social institutions. We’ve reached a turning point and it’s time to evolve\, or we go the way of the dinosaurs. We all need to act now to survive and find new ways to thrive in a changed world. But in an age of polarized debates on complex issues (such as fairness and climate change)\, how can leaders find a new way forward? How can enterprises re-invent themselves to make capitalism work better for more people? These are some of the compelling and timely issues that Donna and Julie will tackle in their conversation. \n\n\n\nOn Wednesday April 13\, Donna and Julie will be in conversation followed by discussion and Q&A. \n\n\n\nTHIS EVENT IS FREE AND OPEN TO EVERYONE! \n\n\n\nJoin our Zoom meeting via the following link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85176061107 \n\n\n\nIf you would like to participate\, have any questions or need any help just contact Eleanor Peat: eleanor@paricenter.com \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDonna Kennedy-Glans is a boundary-crosser\, adding value throughout her career to enterprising projects in over thirty-five countries\, in the public\, private and non-profit sectors: as an energy insider rooted in Alberta’s oil patch; founding a non-profit to build the capacity of women in Yemen; serving as an elected politician and cabinet minister; holding leading roles on boards of directors; and helping to steward the family farm enterprise. She is a political commentator\, community builder\, writer and speaker\, weighing in on energy\, leadership\, governance\, community and integrity issues. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nJulie Arts is currently on a sabbatical from being a senior faculty member and consultant with the Presencing Institute (PI)\, an organisation founded in 2006 by Otto Scharmer and colleagues\, to support action research and leadership development for systems change and societal transformation.Julie is an economist by training and has worked as a senior consultant\, designing and hosting multi-stakeholder transition processes and ecosystem leadership programs such as the UN SDG Leadership Lab and many in-house leadership programs for companies and NGOs. \n\n\n\nJulie is also a board member of Meg Wheatley’s Berkana Institute. She lives in Mechelen\, Belgium and in Pari\, Italy.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/teaching-the-dinosaur-to-dance-moving-beyond-business-as-usual/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/TeachingDinosaursToDance_Front_Cover_IG-scaled-e1649190699468.jpeg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220427T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220427T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20220324T192944Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240423T211054Z
UID:10000160-1651082400-1651089600@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:The Future Scientist – A Conversation with Dr Vandana Shiva
DESCRIPTION:Watch the recording\n\n\n\n\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j41Fcg2HmdY\n\n\n\n\n\nA Conversation between Dr. Vandana Shiva and Dr. Àlex Gómez-Marín \n\n\n\nWednesday April 279:00am PDT  | 12:00pm EDT  | 5:00pm BST  |  6:00pm CEST \n\n\n\nThe session is live and all registered participants will receive the RECORDING. \n\n\n\nA monthly virtual encounter to understand where science is going and to reimage where we hope it might go. \n\n\n\nThe dialogue will be in a lively and spontaneous format of approximately 45 minutes up to an hour and we will then open up for questions from the audience. \n\n\n\nScience is more than an academic activity circumscribed to laboratories and seminar rooms; it is a human creative effort that has political implications and bears societal responsibilities. In this installment of The Future Scientist series\, we will explore what scientists actually do\, aren’t doing\, and could do in the wider picture of the troubled relationship between human beings and the Earth. Drawing from science and philosophy\, but also from real-world activism\, we will explicitly address the pervasive and pernicious effects of the neoliberal tide and discuss how to enact reciprocal transformations at the individual and planetary levels\, so as to honor the land\, the feminine and\, above all\, mother nature. The Future Scientist shall not be the modern Prometheus. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDr Vandana Shiva is an Indian scholar\, activist\, and author. A food sovereignty advocate\, environmentalist\, and ecofeminist\, Shiva holds a PhD in physics and has written more than 20 books\, including Making Peace with the Earth\, Staying Alive\, Monocultures of the Mind\, Democratizing Biology\, Soil Not Oil\, and Stolen Harvest. Based in Delhi\, she is referred to as “Gandhi of grain” for her activism associated with the anti-GMO movement. Shiva is one of the leaders and board members of the International Forum on Globalization\, and a figure of the anti-globalization movement. She has worked as a consultant for the Indian government and abroad\, and in NGOs such as the International Forum on Globalization\, Women’s Environment & Development Organization and Third World Network. She is a co-founder of the gender unit of the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development\, and of the Women’s Environment & Development Organization. Shiva has received numerous international honors\, such as the John Lennon-Yoko Ono Grant for Peace (2008)\, Sydney’s Peace Prize (2010)\, Calgary’s Peace Prize (2011)\, and the Right Livelihood Award (1993)\, which is regarded as the “alternative Nobel Prize”. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDr Àlex Gómez-Marín is a Spanish physicist turned neuroscientist. He holds a PhD in theoretical physics and a Masters in biophysics from the University of Barcelona. He was a research fellow at the EMBL-CRG Centre for Genomic Regulation and at the Champalimaud Center for the Unknown in Lisbon. His research spans from the origins of the arrow of time to the neurobiology of action-perception in flies\, worms\, mice\, humans and robots. Since 2016 he is the head of the Behavior of Organisms Laboratory at the Instituto de Neurociencias in Alicante\, where he is an Associate Professor of the Spanish Research Council. Combining high-resolution experiments\, computational and theoretical biology\, and continental philosophy\, his latest research concentrates on real-life cognition and consciousness. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThe Future Scientist Series\n\n\n\nScience as we know it is a relatively recent human invention. \n\n\n\nAfter the ‘scientific revolution’ of the seventeenth century\, science and philosophy remained entangled as ‘natural philosophy’ until they started to separate in the nineteenth century (the very word ‘scientist’ was coined in 1834). Subsequently\, science morphed from an activity carried out by wealthy people as a hobby (the ‘amateur\,’ in the etymological sense of the word) into a paid job within an institutionalized system (the ‘professional’). Paradoxically or not\, great ideas come more easily from people who are not paid to have them—it’s like forcing someone to be free\, or compelling creativity by an act of will. \n\n\n\nIn the last decades\, a series of technological and societal changes have further accelerated mutations of what it means to be a scientist; from the selection forces cast by neoliberalism on ‘scientific careers\,’ to the kind of ‘science in the age of selfies’ that social media promotes. Scientists too are prey to the perverse dynamics of nowadays ‘attention economy.’ To understand what scientists do and why they do it\, one must also understand the political and social contexts in which they live. \n\n\n\nIn addition\, the rise of ‘big science’—initially in physics (particle physics and astronomy)\, and subsequently in life and mind sciences (genomics\, and connectomics)—is reconfiguring the landscape typically inhabited by the romantic figure of the lone scientist receiving visions in dream-like states of consciousness and\, eventually\, advancing science in a stroke of genius. In turn\, the idea of the scientist bred in the current academe is that of a diligent caffeinated deluxe technician as a part within the larger mechanism of research group army; a person trained exquisitely (and almost exclusively) on a research aspect\, a specialist unable to keep track of what goes on beyond the narrow confines of his/her discipline. Young scientists are indeed trained to be good at following rules and procedures (explicit laboratory protocols\, but also implicit codes of conduct and metaphysical commitments) but discouraged to learn to see when and how to transcend them. \n\n\n\nIn turn\, the more recent promises of ‘big data’ and ‘artificial intelligence’ posit a near-future landscape where some of the core skills and tasks traditionally attributed to humans may be soon carried out by machines (or so the ‘scientific soteriologists’ claim). Algorithms are not just ingenious means to an end that require human intervention to imbue them with meaning\, but are swiftly becoming ends in themselves\, pretending they offer an automated unbiased interpretation of the data. \n\n\n\nA re-appraisal of the habits of the modern scientist entails an ethical dimension as well: why do we treat animals as objects (as means\, rather than ends in themselves)\, why do we study life in laboratories primarily by killing it\, and why do we study life in laboratories in the first place? These questions also reflect on ecological considerations regarding our place in nature (humans in relationship with other animals\, and other kingdoms of life) and our destruction of the planet. Francis Bacon’s prophetic vision of the Promethean scientist\, so vividly captured in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein\, has become both a cautionary tale and an inspiration. \n\n\n\nIn addition\, and despite the real ‘paradigm changes’ in physics at the beginning of the twentieth century\, other branches of science such as biology and neuroscience remain under the spell of philosophical promissory materialism. Research facts are sold in tandem with covert metaphysical commitments. The objective-subjective divide still puzzles both scientists and the layperson. The mind-body problem remains to be solved (or dissolved). \n\n\n\nIn sum\, the whole enterprise seems to be committed to suppressing broad thinkers\, promoting academics that look more like corporate managers\, PR mavericks and professional fund-raisers and less like scholars\, who are asked to inhibit their interest in philosophy\, and to cast suspicion on their fertile imagination. Dogma and habit are inhibiting free inquiry. \n\n\n\nIt is as if science as a whole is becoming less scientific. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nIn the face of this milieu of factors\, in this series of online events we seek to reflect on what ‘the future scientist’ may look like. This is an ambitious exercise indeed\, which goes beyond mere theoretical speculation. It is not unlikely that sooner than we think current science will be unrecognizable to most of us. The consequences for humanity writ large\, not just for scientists themselves\, are pressing. \n\n\n\nThe question at stake is whether by ‘future scientist’ we mean what scientists in the future are all likely to look like\, or what a future better scientist might look like. In our conversations we will engage more in prescribing than in predicting\, that is\, we might begin by describing where science is going (prediction) to then describe where we hope science might go (prescription). Attempting the art of ‘dia-logos\,’ we hope to express a creative voice that will enlighten the way of a new science in the twenty-first century. \n\n\n\nThe series will be direct conversations\, that is\, no formal presentation of the invited speaker but a kind of ‘thinking aloud’ in the mode of a dialogue between each guest and Àlex Gómez-Marín as the conversation host. The idea is to engage critically with various aspects of ‘the future scientist’ in a lively and spontaneous format for approximately 45 minutes to an hour\, followed by comments and questions from the audience. Each conversation will take place virtually\, on a Wednesday each month. \n\n\n\nThe invited speakers to The Future Scientist series are chosen not just as great interlocutors to discuss these issues\, but also as exemplars and hints of what ‘the future scientist’ may actually look like here and now.
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/the-future-scientist-a-conversation-with-dr-vandana-shiva/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/The-Future-Scientist-2-e1648150600422.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220507T175900
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220529T200000
DTSTAMP:20260404T010958
CREATED:20240314T204820Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240423T210227Z
UID:10000162-1651946340-1653854400@paricenter.com
SUMMARY:Love in the Time of Crisis
DESCRIPTION:Love in the Time of CrisisFrom Separation to Interbeing \n\n\n\nwith John Briggs\, Will Buckingham\, Jane Clark\, Vincent Colapietro\, Satish Kumar\, Ramona Rolle-Berg\, Renée Rolle-Whatley\, Rabbi Neal Rose and Mark Vernonand Special guest poet Richard Berengarten \n\n\n\nPari Center Online Series \n\n\n\nMay 7 – 8\, 14 – 15\, 21 – 22\, 28 – 29\, 20229:00 PDT | 12:00 EDT | 17:00 BST  |  18:00 CEST \n\n\n\n8 Two-hour sessions\, Saturdays and Sundays \n\n\n\nBlessed be the covenant of love between what is hidden and what is revealed.Leonard Cohen \n\n\n\nWe live in a challenging time of transition which promises both hope and peril.  How are we to navigate a course that will take us from a story of separation\, competition\, and distrust to a new narrative of inter-being\, cooperation\, and love? How do we begin to give up and move beyond an incoherent and too often destructive structure of consciousness and a world which seems rarely to see the mediating presence of what has been called ‘evolutionary love’? \n\n\n\nThis program approaches these questions and others from a wide variety of perspectives: \n\n\n\nOn our journey we explore the concept of ‘evolutionary love’ in the context of the metaphysics of Charles Sanders Peirce with Vincent Colapietro. We travel into and through the rich imagery of love in literature and culture with John Briggs. We enter energy and mind-body medicine with Renee Rolle-Whatley and Ramona Rolle-Berg\, each of whom holds a PhD in Mind Body Medicine\, as we explore parental love. With Mark Vernon we will address the need for a deeper awareness of love that becomes particularly acute in times of crisis\, though times of crisis also offer moments to understand love move fully. \n\n\n\nSatish Kumar brings us to ecology\, approached from a love which finds its expression in a reverence for nature—which he strongly feels should be at the heart of every political and social debate. Jane Clark and Mark Vernon take us with them in a journey which explores the meaning of divine love. \n\n\n\nIn this program\, we will approach love from multiple perspectives of how to go about restoring the power of love—the power of a positive mediating force\, to enliven\, re-enchant\, and re-invigorate our world. We seek pathways that restore reason as a guide to the expansion of knowledge and understanding\, and we see love as a guide\, bringing goodness and order to their application. From within the midst of present chaos\, we look to love in its varied dimensions to bring quiescence within\, and creativity and intelligence in its outer expression. \n\n\n\nWe are again fortunate to have poet\, Richard Berengarten\, as part of our series on the theme of love. Richard will be read short poems from several of his collections\, including The Blue Butterfly\,  Notness\, Changing \, and a new sequence of villanelles in honour of Tao Yuanming\, entitled The Wine Cup. Richard will briefly introduce himself and his work and each session will begin with his reading from one of these books. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nProgram of Event\n\n\n\nSaturday May 7Temporality and Tragedy: Irrevocable Loss and Redemptive Lovewith Vincent Colapietro \n\n\n\nSunday May 8Tales of Love and Narcissism in Classical Jewish Sourceswith Rabbi Neal Rose \n\n\n\nSaturday May 14Portrayals of Love in Literature and Culturewith John Briggs \n\n\n\nSunday May 15Power of Lovewith Satish Kumar \n\n\n\nSaturday May 21Parenting as a Journey towards Awakening: Exploring Self-growth through the Hidden Guidance of the Heartwith Ramona Rolle-Berg and Renée Rolle-Whatley \n\n\n\nSunday May 22Love In A Time of Crisiswith Mark Vernon \n\n\n\nSaturday May 28Love Across Traditionswith Jane Clark and Mark Vernon \n\n\n\nSunday May 29Strangers on the Threshold: Love\, Wisdom\, and the Task of Philosophywith Will Buckingham
URL:https://paricenter.com/event/love-in-the-time-of-crisis-2/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://paricenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Love-poster2-e1650967478591.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR